Other Courts

Bareilly Court Summons Owaisi Over “Jai Palestine” Oath Remark

A Bareilly court has issued a notice to All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) President Asaduddin Owaisi, instructing him to appear for a hearing on January 7, 2025.

The notice stems from a case filed by advocate Virendra Gupta, alleging that Owaisi violated constitutional and legal norms by raising pro-Palestine slogans during his oath as a Member of Parliament.

The controversy began in June when Owaisi concluded his Lok Sabha oath with the phrases, “Jai Bhim, Jai Meem, Jai Telangana, Jai Palestine.” This incident occurred after his fifth consecutive electoral victory from Hyderabad, where he defeated BJP candidate Madhavi Latha Kompella by an impressive margin of 3,38,087 votes.

Speaking to the media about the incident, Owaisi defended his choice of words, stating, “Everyone is saying a lot of things… I just said ‘Jai Bhim, Jai Meem, Jai Telangana, Jai Palestine.’ How is it against [the Constitution]? Show the provision in the Constitution.” When asked specifically about his mention of Palestine, Owaisi explained, “The people there are destitute (mahroom). Mahatma Gandhi has said so many things regarding Palestine, and one can go and read.”

This statement has reignited discussions about Palestine amidst ongoing conflict in the region. Since October 7, 2023, Israel’s war on Gaza has claimed over 45,129 Palestinian lives and injured 1,07,338 people. In contrast, at least 1,139 individuals were killed in Israel during Hamas-led attacks on the same day, with more than 200 taken captive.

Owaisi’s remarks have sparked mixed reactions. While some view his statement as an expression of solidarity with oppressed communities, others argue it breaches parliamentary decorum. Advocate Virendra Gupta’s case against Owaisi underscores these tensions, focusing on whether the slogans constitute a legal violation.

The court’s notice highlights the delicate intersection of personal beliefs, political responsibilities, and legal boundaries in public office. The January 2025 hearing is expected to address these concerns, setting a precedent for how such matters are handled in Indian politics.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay HC To Protect His Personality Rights

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…

2 months ago

Bribery Case: CBI Arrests NHIDCL Executive Director

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Slew Of Directions On Green Crackers Issue

The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…

2 months ago

INX Media Case: Delhi HC Relaxes Travel Restrictions On Karti Chidambaram

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Rules Lawyers’ Offices Not Commercial Establishments; Quashes NDMC Case Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel To Dubai For Diwali Event

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…

2 months ago