Other Courts

Bareilly Court Summons Owaisi Over “Jai Palestine” Oath Remark

A Bareilly court has issued a notice to All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) President Asaduddin Owaisi, instructing him to appear for a hearing on January 7, 2025.

The notice stems from a case filed by advocate Virendra Gupta, alleging that Owaisi violated constitutional and legal norms by raising pro-Palestine slogans during his oath as a Member of Parliament.

The controversy began in June when Owaisi concluded his Lok Sabha oath with the phrases, “Jai Bhim, Jai Meem, Jai Telangana, Jai Palestine.” This incident occurred after his fifth consecutive electoral victory from Hyderabad, where he defeated BJP candidate Madhavi Latha Kompella by an impressive margin of 3,38,087 votes.

Speaking to the media about the incident, Owaisi defended his choice of words, stating, “Everyone is saying a lot of things… I just said ‘Jai Bhim, Jai Meem, Jai Telangana, Jai Palestine.’ How is it against [the Constitution]? Show the provision in the Constitution.” When asked specifically about his mention of Palestine, Owaisi explained, “The people there are destitute (mahroom). Mahatma Gandhi has said so many things regarding Palestine, and one can go and read.”

This statement has reignited discussions about Palestine amidst ongoing conflict in the region. Since October 7, 2023, Israel’s war on Gaza has claimed over 45,129 Palestinian lives and injured 1,07,338 people. In contrast, at least 1,139 individuals were killed in Israel during Hamas-led attacks on the same day, with more than 200 taken captive.

Owaisi’s remarks have sparked mixed reactions. While some view his statement as an expression of solidarity with oppressed communities, others argue it breaches parliamentary decorum. Advocate Virendra Gupta’s case against Owaisi underscores these tensions, focusing on whether the slogans constitute a legal violation.

The court’s notice highlights the delicate intersection of personal beliefs, political responsibilities, and legal boundaries in public office. The January 2025 hearing is expected to address these concerns, setting a precedent for how such matters are handled in Indian politics.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Delhi HC Bars Non-Advocates From Representing Litigants In Consumer Courts

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday has strongly objected to the practice of non-advocates and…

13 hours ago

Delhi HC Mandates Free Medical Care For Rape, Acid Attack, Sexual Assault, POCSO Victims

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday directed that survivors of rape, acid attacks, sexual assaults,…

14 hours ago

Congress Challenges Election Rules Amendment In Supreme Court

A petition has been filed in the Supreme Court challenging the recent amendments to the…

15 hours ago

Delhi HC Rejects To Intervene In Order For Revision In CLAT-2025 Result

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday declined to intervene in a ruling that directed the…

15 hours ago

“Unsafe, Shoddy Signature View Flats”: Delhi HC Slams DDA; Allows Demolition

The Delhi High Court on Monday sharply criticized the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) for its…

17 hours ago

Supreme Court Rebukes Registry For Failing To List Cases Despite Judicial Orders

The Supreme Court recently criticized its registry for failing to list cases as directed by…

18 hours ago