Categories: Other Courts

Bombay HC Feels Pain As Girls Are Still Treated As Commodities, Granted Bail To Accused

Justice SM Modak recently expressed “great pains” over incidents in which girls were being used as commodities for financial benefits even in the twenty-first century in the Bombay High Court.

However, the Bombay High Court recently granted bail to a woman accused of stealing a one-year-old child from his biological mother.

The Bench observed, “We are in the 21st century, still there are incidents wherein the girls are treated as commodity and they have been used as a medium for financial benefits. It is highly objectionable to moral and human rights principles that a one-year-old girl be sold by her natural mother.”

However, the judge noted that the ‘sale’ occurred because the biological mother’s husband was in prison and they needed money.

Following the sale, the biological mother had managed to repay the applicant’s loan and sought the return of her child. However, the applicant woman and her husband refused to return the child, prompting a complaint to be filed against them.

The couple was charged with violating Section 370 of the IPC (person trafficking), Section 81 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (prohibition on the sale or acquisition of children for any reason), and Section 39 (money lending business without license) of the Maharashtra Money-Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014.

The applicant applied to the High Court seeking bail in the case. The court granted bail on a surety of Rs 25,000, stating that there was no need to keep her in jail because the trial in the case would not begin for some time and she had two minor children whose welfare must also be considered.

The Court stated in its order, “In addition, the applicant has two minor children. The sold baby is still with her (biological) parents. One does not know when the trial will begin or when it will end. There is no need to keep the applicant behind bars until the trial is over. She has two minor children as well. Their welfare also needs to be considered.”

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

12 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

12 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

12 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

13 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

13 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

13 hours ago