Bombay HC Orders Dynamic Injuction Against IG Accounts In Copyright Suit Filed By ‘Scam 1992’ Makers

The Bombay High Court recently awarded a ‘dynamic injunction’ against thirty-two Instagram account holders and John Doe (unknown parties) in a copyright infringement suit filed by the creators of the online web-series Scam 1992: The Harshad Mehta Story.

Justice Manish Pitale held that thirty-two social media accounts added as defendants in the suit used Instagram to illegally use parts or clips of the audio-visual content of the web series on their handles to promote their own business activities.

This was a violation of proprietary rights of the makers, Applause Entertainment Private Limited.

Applause apprehended such illegal activities by the current defendants as well as other entities by creating multiple identities (social media handles) to circumvent the High Court’s order of injunction.

As a result, Justice Pitale deemed it appropriate to provide ex-parte relief of dynamic injunction.

A dynamic injunction allows the copyright holder to approach the courts to extend the main injunction order against all mirror websites that may access the infringing website.

Applause had asked the Court to assert its copyright as the owner and proprietor of publicity and character rights in relation to the web series and its cast members.

In December 2022, it was discovered that Instagram accounts were utilising parts of the series in the context of their businesses or to promote their accounts in order to gain income.

Following that, the production company filed a complaint against such accounts, but received no response from Instagram. The account holders allegedly continued with their activities of infringing on Applause’s proprietary rights.

Applause identified other social media handles in March 2023 by using clips and abbreviated versions of the web series. When this was reported, Meta Platforms Inc, which owns Instagram, did not respond. The company eventually responded to Applause, arguing that it was unclear whether Applause was truly the owner of the series’ copyright.

As a result, Applause was forced to file a petition before the High Court.

The Court prohibited the defendants from infringing on Applause’s exclusive copyright subsisting in the web-series and asked them to delete any existing infringing posts on their accounts. Meta Platforms was also ordered to remove, delete, or take down the infringing Instagram posts.

Meta was also ordered to provide Applause with all details about these handles, including but not limited to their contact information, mobile numbers, email addresses, IP addresses, and physical location.

Isha Das

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

12 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

12 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

12 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

13 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

13 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

13 hours ago