Calcutta HC Demands Police Explanation Why Person Accused Of Threatening Alleged Gang-Rape Victim Was Released

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Calcutta High Court has expressed its displeasure with the action of police authorities in “promptly releasing” a person accused of threatening the victim of an alleged gang rape in Vedic Village in Rajarghat to withdraw her case.

A division bench of Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta and Justice Joymalya Bagchi has ordered the Officer-in-Charge of the concerned Police Station to appear in person and explain why the aforementioned course of action was taken.

In her complaint, the victim claimed that four men gang raped her at a party in November 2022 after spiking her drink.

The victim identified Vishal Periwaj as the man who threatened her in court, and the trial court ordered the investigating officer to turn him over to Lake Police Station. He was charged with violating Sections 195A (threaten to give false evidence) and 506 (criminal intimidation) of the IPC and was remanded in custody on May 17.

To the surprise of the court, he was soon released on personal bond.

We are conscious of the directions given by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Arnesh vs. State of Bihar and reiterated in Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI & Anr. with regard to release of undertrials in cases involving offences punishable with imprisonment upto 7 years. Moreover, one of the exceptions to grant of bail in such cases is threat or  intimidation to witnesses. Trial Judge had noted the apprehension expressed by a vulnerable witness with regard to threat held out by the said accused and had directed the investigating officer to take him into custody. It may be relevant to note threat, inducement to a witness is a valid ground for arrest and detention of an accused as per Section of 41(b)(ii)(d) of the Code of Criminal Procedure in cases involving offences upto 7 years. In such cases the police would not justified to resort to Section 41 -A of the Code of Criminal Procedure and/or release such an accused on personal bond particularly when the vulnerable witness is being examined,” the bench noted.

The bench issued the said person a suo motu notice to show cause why his bail should not be cancelled. The Court also ordered that the said person remain in police custody until further orders are issued and not contact the victim or her family members electronically or otherwise.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

“Wife’s Watching Porn, Self-Pleasure Not Cruelty”: Madras HC Turns Down Husband’s Divorce Plea

The Madras High Court rejected man's request for divorce, dismissing his claims that his wife’s…

10 hours ago

Delhi Riots Case: Delhi HC Lists Tasleem Ahmed’s Bail Plea Before Roster Bench

The Delhi High Court has scheduled the bail plea of Tasleem Ahmed for hearing before…

10 hours ago

Omar Abdullah Announces New Assembly, Salary Hike, Final Amnesty & Heritage Push For J&K

Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah made several significant announcements on Thursday during the…

10 hours ago

UP Court Issues Notice To Rahul Gandhi After Complaint Alleges His Words ‘Hurt Sentiments’

A local court in Sambhal has issued a notice to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, requiring…

11 hours ago

“Grabbing Minor’s Breasts, Breaking Pyjama Strings Doesn’t Qualify As Attempt To Rape”: Allahabad HC

A recent judgment by the Allahabad High Court has sparked a critical examination of India's…

11 hours ago

IPL 2025: Saliva Ban Lifted After BCCI Gets Captains’ Nod

The restriction on using saliva to shine the ball will be removed in the 2025…

13 hours ago