हिंदी

Defamation Case Against Rahul Gandhi: UP Court Defers Hearing To April 15

Rahul Gandhi

A special court in Uttar Pradesh has deferred the hearing of a defamation case against Congress leader and Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, to April 15.

The postponement was due to the complainant’s failure to present a witness, causing a delay in the proceedings.

Court Proceedings

The hearing, scheduled for April 3, could not take place as no witness was brought before the court. Advocate Kashi Prasad Shukla, who is representing Rahul Gandhi in the case, confirmed the delay.

“The hearing was supposed to be conducted today, but since the complainant failed to present any witness, no proceedings could be held. The court has now fixed April 15 as the next date for the hearing,” Shukla stated.

Case Background

The defamation case against Rahul Gandhi stems from alleged remarks he made in the past. While the specific comments leading to the complaint have not been disclosed in detail, such cases often arise due to political statements perceived as defamatory by opponents.

This is not the first time Rahul Gandhi has faced legal trouble over his remarks. In the past, he has been involved in multiple defamation cases filed by political rivals and individuals who claimed to be personally affected by his statements.

Political Implications

Defamation cases fall under Sections 499 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which define defamation and prescribe penalties, including fines or imprisonment. If the complainant can provide substantial evidence, the case could proceed to trial. However, repeated delays in presenting witnesses could weaken the prosecution’s argument.

From a political standpoint, such legal battles add to the challenges faced by Rahul Gandhi as he prepares for the upcoming elections. His legal team is expected to argue for the case’s dismissal if the complainant fails to provide credible evidence in the next hearing.

With the court setting April 15 as the new date, all eyes will be on whether the complainant presents a witness and how the case progresses.

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtInternational

Recommended For You

About the Author: Meera Verma

Swargate Bus Rape Case: Accused Remanded To Judicial Custody Till Mar 26 Centre, Delhi Govt Should Decide Over Sainik Farm Regularisation: Delhi HC SC Slams States, Union Territories For Not Filing Status Reports Delhi Govt Taking Steps To Resolve Coaching Centres’ Issues: HC ‘Incident Not In Public View’: SC Disposes Of Case Under SC-ST Act