Other Courts

Defamation Case: Delhi Court Set Aside Summons Order Issued To CM Atishi

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Rouse Avenue Court on Tuesday quashed a summon issued to Delhi Chief Minister Atishi Marlena in a defamation case filed by BJP leader Praveen Shankar Kapoor.

Special Judge Vishal Gogne allowed Atishi’s appeal and stated that the summoning order passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate contained material errors and infirmities. The court emphasized that the threshold for political defamation cases is high, as they involve freedom of speech and the political discourse integral to a democracy.

The defamation case arose after Atishi alleged in a press conference that the BJP had approached her to join their party, warning that she would face arrest by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) if she refused.

Kapoor, a BJP spokesperson and Delhi media head, argued that Atishi’s statements were defamatory and harmed the reputation of the BJP and its members.

Key Court Observations

1. Political Context: The court noted that the allegations were inherently political, requiring a higher threshold for defamation claims.
2. Freedom of Speech: Allegations of corruption or political poaching fall within the scope of free speech, especially when directed at political parties, which are subjects of public discourse.
3. Arbitrary Complaint: The court deemed Kapoor’s complaint ill-conceived, observing that he was not an aggrieved party as defined by law. The court highlighted that even the Delhi BJP chief, Virendra Sachdeva, had sought an investigation into Atishi’s claims, underscoring that the allegations were not personal to Kapoor.

Arguments Presented

Senior advocate Ramesh Gupta, representing Atishi, argued that political defamation cases require specific evidence, which was lacking in Kapoor’s complaint. He further contended that only the BJP as an entity, not individual members, could claim defamation in such cases.

On behalf of Kapoor, senior advocate Ajay Burman contended that Atishi’s remarks at the press conference were false and intentionally defamatory. He argued that her statements had caused reputational harm to Kapoor due to his association with the BJP.

Court’s Decision

The court found that the summoning order issued by the Magistrate on May 28, 2024, lacked sufficient grounds. It highlighted that press conferences are forums for political expression, and statements made therein do not meet the high threshold required for defamation claims against political figures.

The court also noted that Atishi’s allegations had prompted a pending investigation by the crime branch, further undermining the basis of Kapoor’s complaint.

Background

Atishi, during an April 2024 press conference, alleged that the BJP had attempted to coerce her into joining their party by threatening her with ED action. She declared that her party, AAP, would continue to resist such tactics under the leadership of Arvind Kejriwal.

Kapoor subsequently filed a defamation complaint, asserting that Atishi’s remarks were false, scandalous, and damaging to the BJP’s reputation. The Magistrate initially summoned Atishi, leading her to appeal the order.

Conclusion

The court’s ruling reinforces the principle that freedom of speech in the political domain carries a high threshold for defamation claims. Detailed reasoning for the decision will be provided in a subsequent order.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

SC Rejects Bail To Accused; Directs Karnataka Govt To Set Up More UAPA Courts For Speedy Trial

The Rouse Avenue Court on Thursday granted interim protection to AAP MLA-elect Amanatullah Khan, shielding…

8 hours ago

Journalist Assault Case: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail To Telugu Actor Mohan Babu

The Supreme Court on Thursday granted anticipatory bail to veteran Telugu actor and former MP…

11 hours ago

SC Commences Hearing On Question If Courts Can Modify Arbitral Awards

A five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court on Thursday began hearings on whether courts…

13 hours ago

19 Months After Arrest, Ex-Dean Of COVID-19 Jumbo Centre Gets Bail From Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court on Wednesday granted bail to Dr. Kishore Bisure, former dean of…

15 hours ago

“Nehru-Gandhi Family Nurtured, Promoted Accused Of 1984 Riots” Says Sachdeva After Sajjan Kumar Convicted For Anti-Sikh Riots

In a landmark judicial pronouncement, the Rouse Avenue Court has recently convicted former Congress leader…

16 hours ago

SC Criticizes Freebies Culture, Questions If It’s Creating ‘Class Of Parasites’

The Supreme Court on Wednesday expressed concern over the negative impact of the practice of…

1 day ago