Other Courts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case filed by BJP leader Kirit Somaiya’s wife, Medha Somaiya.

The court ruled that Raut, as a Member of Parliament, failed to exercise the “care and caution” expected of someone in his position when making certain statements.

Judicial Magistrate (First Class) Aarti Kulkarni found Raut guilty of defamation under IPC Section 500 last week, sentencing him to 15 days in jail and imposing a fine of ₹25,000. However, the sentence was suspended for one month, allowing Raut to appeal the decision in a higher court.

In the detailed order made public on Thursday, the court emphasized that Medha Somaiya is a highly qualified and respected individual whose reputation was significantly harmed by Raut’s statements. The court noted, “She has suffered mental agony” due to the defamatory remarks.

As an MP, Raut holds a high degree of responsibility when expressing himself publicly. The court stated, “The accused made statements through the media against the complainant without due care and caution.” It pointed out that Raut, despite knowing the potential for defamation, chose not to exercise the necessary diligence and published his statements.

The magistrate concluded that granting probation to Raut would not be appropriate under the circumstances. Regarding the punishment, the court determined that given the mental distress Medha Somaiya endured as a result of Raut’s statements, a sentence of simple imprisonment for 15 days and a fine of ₹25,000 were just and appropriate.

Medha Somaiya’s complaint, filed through her advocate Vivekanand Gupta in 2022, alleged that Raut made baseless and defamatory claims against her and her husband, accusing them of involvement in a ₹100 crore scam related to the construction and maintenance of public toilets in the Mira Bhayander Municipal Corporation area.

She contended that these statements were disseminated widely through electronic and print media, as well as social media platforms.

Her plea asserted that the remarks made by Raut were inherently defamatory and intended to “malign my character in the eyes of the general public.” The court’s ruling highlights the importance of accountability for public figures in their public statements, especially regarding serious allegations that can damage reputations.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Centre Opposes Ex-Judges Panel To Monitor Stubble Burning In SC

The Centre on Friday opposed a proposal in the Supreme Court to form a committee…

5 hours ago

“It’s A Celebration For Us”: Delhi HC Bar Association Felicitates CJI Sanjiv Khanna

The Delhi High Court Bar Association on Friday honored Chief Justice of India Justice Sanjiv…

5 hours ago

International Criminal Court Issues Arrest Warrant For Israeli PM Netanyahu

The International Criminal Court has recently issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,…

6 hours ago

Cal HC Stays Demolition Of Illegal Constructions In WB’s Mandarmoni

The Calcutta High Court on Friday granted an interim stay on the demolition of alleged…

6 hours ago

SC To Pass Order On Pleas To Efface Words ‘Secular’, ‘Socialist’ From Preamble

The Supreme Court on Friday announced that it would deliver its order on November 25…

6 hours ago

Air Pollution: SC Questions Delhi Govt On Truck Entry Amid GRAP-4 Restrictions

The Supreme Court raised concerns on Friday about the "drastic" consequences of the GRAP Stage…

7 hours ago