Categories: Other Courts

Defamation Suit in Singapore HC: SC Issues Notice on Subramanian Swamy’s Plea

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader, Dr. Subramanian Swamy has moved the Supreme Court against an order issued by the Madras High Court. This order allowed Advantage Strategic Consulting, a foreign trading firm, to proceed with a defamation lawsuit against Swamy in the High Court of Singapore.

A bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and Dipankar Datta has issued a notice to Advantage Strategic Consulting Pvt Ltd in response to Swamy’s appeal. The hearing for this matter is scheduled to take place after a period of six weeks.

Swamy’s challenge pertains to an April 18 order by a division bench of the high court. This order set aside an interim injunction that had been granted against Advantage Strategic Consulting by a single judge back in 2014.

The origin of the issue dates back to a press conference held by Swamy in New Delhi on April 26, 2012. During the conference, Swamy reportedly made comments regarding alleged irregularities in the allocation of the 2G spectrum and the Aircel-Maxis deal.

Advantage Strategic Consulting Private Limited took offense to Swamy’s statements and issued a legal notice in response. Subsequently, the firm’s Singapore subsidiary, bearing the same name, initiated defamation proceedings against Swamy in the Singapore High Court.

Swamy had previously lodged a contempt of court petition in the Supreme Court, contending that he should not be compelled to face legal action for his involvement in 2G-related cases filed in the apex court. However, this petition was dismissed on September 10, 2013.

During the tenure of the UPA 2 government, led by Manmohan Singh, a significant scandal emerged involving an alleged presumptive loss of Rs 1.76 lakh crore due to the allocation of 122 2G spectrum licenses to telecom companies. The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) criticized the government for granting licenses at outdated prices and without adhering to a competitive bidding process.

In December 2017, a special court in Delhi acquitted all the accused individuals in the case, including the then-Telecommunications Minister A Raja and DMK MP Kanimozhi. The court ruled that the prosecution had failed to establish the charges against them beyond a reasonable doubt.

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Delhi Court Rejects BJP Leader’s Defamation Plea Against AAP’s Saurabh Bharadwaj

A Delhi court has dismissed a plea by BJP leader Suraj Bhan Chauhan seeking the…

1 day ago

James Murray Accused Of Sending Inappropriate Messages To Minor

James Murray, one of the stars of the comedy series Impractical Jokers, is facing allegations…

1 day ago

Mahatma Gandhi’s Great-Grandson Moves SC Against Sabarmati Ashram Redevelopment

Tushar Gandhi, the great-grandson of Mahatma Gandhi, has filed a petition in the Supreme Court…

1 day ago

ITAT Grants Tax Exemption To Kapil Dev On ₹1.5 Crore BCCI Payment

In a significant ruling, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has recently granted tax exemption to…

1 day ago

“Not Acceptable That Children Need To Wear Masks To Play Outside”: SC Judge Justice Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Judge Justice Vikram Nath on Saturday has raised concerns over the continued requirement…

1 day ago

Government Criticizes ‘X’ Over Censorship Allegations In Karnataka HC

The Central government has strongly objected to claims of censorship made by Elon Musk-owned social…

1 day ago