Other Courts

Delhi Court Acquits Six Individuals in 2020 Northeast Delhi Riots Case

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

A Delhi court has recently acquitted six individuals accused of rioting, arson, and looting during the 2020 northeast Delhi riots.

Additional Sessions Judge Pulastya Pramachala delivered the verdict in the case against Sahil, Dinesh, Tinku, Sandeep, Vikas Kashyap, and Sonu.

The accused were allegedly involved in a riotous mob that trespassed and committed theft in a shop in Bhagirathi Vihar on the night of February 24-25, 2020. They were also accused of being part of an unlawful assembly that engaged in arson, trespassing, and theft in a nearby house at around 9 pm on February 24, 2020.

“I find that charges levelled against the accused persons, in this case, are not proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Hence, all the accused persons are acquitted of all the charges levelled against them in this case,” the court stated.

The judge took into consideration the testimonies of two prosecution witnesses, a constable, and an assistant sub-inspector, who claimed to have witnessed the incidents.

“If I compare the testimony of both these witnesses, I find a huge gap of timing of the incidents in their statements,” the court observed.

The judge emphasized that considering the circumstances, it is difficult to solely rely on the witnesses’ claims of having witnessed both incidents.

The court concluded that the evidence presented can be considered as circumstantial, and it cannot definitively establish that a mob was responsible for both incidents under investigation. It further remarked that the identification of the accused as part of the mob was insufficient evidence, as they were only shown as being present on the road at some point in time.

The court also highlighted that separate cases had been registered by the police based on specific incidents of riots, indicating the need for more substantial evidence to establish the accused’s involvement in those specific incidents. The judge further remarked that it was the prosecution’s responsibility to demonstrate that all the accused individuals were part of the mob that engaged in vandalism, arson, and looting at the two properties in question. The court further noted that one of the complainants mentioned being informed about the time of the incident by a neighbor, but the neighbor was not located or examined as a witness.

Based on these circumstances, the judge concluded that the prosecution had not established beyond reasonable doubt that the accused individuals were part of the mob responsible for the incidents in question.

The Gokalpuri police station had registered an FIR against the six accused under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), including rioting, based on two complaints.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

SC Ruling Paves Way For Visually Impaired Judges; Yavnika Shares Her Experience

Supreme Court recently opened up the doors for visually impaired candidates in judiciary by striking…

2 days ago

Supreme Court To Hear Plea To Debar Poll Candidates Charged For Serious Offences On Mar 18

The Supreme Court is set to hear a plea on March 18 that seeks to…

2 days ago

Bombay HC Grants Pension Benefits To Former Judge Pushpa Ganediwala

The Bombay High Court has ruled in favor of former Additional Judge Pushpa Ganediwala, granting…

2 days ago

Bombay HC Sets Aside Complaint Against Kailash Kher For Hurting Religious Feelings

The Bombay High Court has dismissed a complaint against singer Kailash Kher, which alleged that…

2 days ago

Uttarakhand HC Stays Proposed Felling Of 3,300 Trees In Shivalik Elephant Reserve

The Uttarakhand High Court has put a temporary halt on the felling of 3,300 trees…

2 days ago

“Notify Posts For Special Education Teachers By March 28”: Supreme Court To States, UTs

The Supreme Court has directed all states and Union Territories to notify the sanctioned posts…

2 days ago