Other Courts

Delhi Court Sets Nov 28 Hearing On Kejriwal’s Plea Over ED Sanction Copy

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Rouse Avenue Court on Tuesday scheduled a hearing for November 28 in a plea filed by Delhi’s former Chief Minister, Arvind Kejriwal, who claimed he has not received a copy of the sanction order in the Enforcement Directorate case against him.

Special Judge Kaveri Baweja granted the ED additional time to file its reply and set the matter for a detailed hearing.

On November 23, the court issued a notice to the ED in response to Kejriwal’s request. The plea pointed out that during a recent hearing in the Delhi High Court, the Solicitor General representing the ED stated that the necessary sanction had been obtained when the chargesheet was filed.

Kejriwal’s lawyer, Advocate Mudit Jain, argued that the documents accompanying the chargesheet did not include the required sanction.

On November 21, the Delhi High Court had issued a notice on Kejriwal’s plea challenging the trial court’s decision to take cognizance of the ED’s chargesheet in the alleged excise policy scam.

While the High Court did not grant a stay on the trial proceedings, it scheduled a hearing for December 20 to consider the stay application and the plea seeking to quash the trial court’s order.

The ED’s Solicitor General, Tushar Mehta, opposed Kejriwal’s plea, asserting that the proper sanction had been obtained when the prosecution complaint (chargesheet) was filed. Kejriwal, who is out on bail in both the ED and CBI cases related to the now-scrapped excise policy, contends that the trial court erred in taking cognizance of the offence without the required sanction under Section 197(1) of the CrPC, which applies to public servants like him.

The ED has accused Kejriwal and other Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leaders of involvement in a scam tied to the excise policy, alleging that it was designed with loopholes to benefit AAP members and foster cartel formations. The ED claims that liquor businesses paid kickbacks in exchange for preferential treatment, including discounts and license fee waivers.

The probe also suggests that the scam was linked to influencing elections in Punjab and Goa in early 2022.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Blake Lively Seeks To Set Aside Justin Baldoni’s Defamation Lawsuit, Arguing California Law Protects Sexual Harassment Accusers

Following a series of legal disputes, Blake Lively has filed a motion in federal court…

32 minutes ago

Bombay HC Rejects Bail To ‘JeM Operative’ Accused Of Conducting Recce Of Hedgewar Memorial

The Nagpur bench of the Bombay High Court on Friday rejected the bail plea of…

1 hour ago

ED Case: Delhi High Court Grants Bail To Unitech’s Ramesh Chandra

In a significant development, the Delhi High Court on Friday granted bail to Ramesh Chandra,…

2 hours ago

Cash Recovery Senior Lawyer Mentions Incident Before Delhi High Court Expresses Pain Over Incident

A senior lawyer on Friday expressed deep shock and pain before the Delhi High Court…

2 hours ago

“Wife’s Watching Porn, Self-Pleasure Not Cruelty”: Madras HC Turns Down Husband’s Divorce Plea

The Madras High Court rejected man's request for divorce, dismissing his claims that his wife’s…

20 hours ago

Delhi Riots Case: Delhi HC Lists Tasleem Ahmed’s Bail Plea Before Roster Bench

The Delhi High Court has scheduled the bail plea of Tasleem Ahmed for hearing before…

20 hours ago