Categories: Other Courts

Delhi High Court: Disclosure Of Documents Regarding Grant Of Sanction For Prosecution U/S 45(1) UAPA Can Be Exempted Under RTI Act

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Delhi High Court in the case Ehtesham Qutubuddin Siddique v. CPIO, Ministry of Home Affairs observed and has dismissed a plea filed by a convict in the Mumbai Twin Blast case (7/11 Bomb Blast case), wherein challenging an order passed by the Central Information Commission (CIC) denying him information regarding the proposal and all documents concerning grant of sanction for prosecution under section 45(1) of the Unlawful Activity (Prevention) Act (UAPA).

In the present case, Ehtesham Qutubuddin Siddique was convicted under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 and National Investigation Act, 2008 and he is presently serving his sentence in Nagpur Central Prison since July, 2006.

While upholding the view taken by CPIO of Ministry of Home Affairs, the CIC had found that the disclosures would stand exempted under section 8(1)(a) of the RTI Act.

The bench comprising of Justice Yashwant Varma while upholding the CIC order was of the view that bearing in mind the provisions made in Section 45 of the UAP Act, the Court is of the firm opinion that the disclosures that were being sought and in the broad terms as were prayed for in the application, the respondents rightly invoked Section 8(1)(a) of the RTI Act.

It has been rejected by the court that the argument of petitioner’s counsel that the CIC was obliged to consider whether the provisions of section 10 of the RTI Act would apply and that whether certain aspects of the information sought were severable, thereby falling outside the scope of section 8(1)(a) of the RTI Act.

However, the Court reasoned that the petitioner had, even on a prima facie footing, failed to establish what information that may ultimately lead to the issuance of the notification under section 45 of the UAP Act would also be severable.

The Court ordered that the writ petition lacks merit and the same shall stand dismissed.

The post Delhi High Court: Disclosure Of Documents Regarding Grant Of Sanction For Prosecution U/S 45(1) UAPA Can Be Exempted Under RTI Act appeared first on The Daily Guardian.

- -

Recent Posts

Justice Yashwant Varma Denies Allegations Of Cash Found At Residence, Probe Panel Formed

Allegations surrounding a fire at the residence of Delhi High Court Judge Justice Yashwant Varma,…

13 hours ago

Delhi Court Dismissed BJP MP Raju Bista’s Defamation Complaint Against MLA Bishnu Sharma

The Rouse Avenue Court on Wednesday declined to take cognizance of a defamation complaint filed…

13 hours ago

Gold Smuggling Scandal: Actress Ranya Rao’s Lawyer Challenges DRI’s Search Consent at Bail Hearing

Actress Ranya Rao, who was caught allegedly smuggling 14.2 kg of gold at Kempegowda International…

14 hours ago

Delhi High Court Allows Withdrawal of PIL Against Yo Yo Honey Singh’s ‘Maniac’ Song

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday permitted the withdrawal of a Public Interest Litigation that…

14 hours ago

Delhi HC Allows Engineer Rashid To Attend Parliament Sessions

The Delhi High Court has granted permission to Engineer Rashid, an independent Member of Parliament…

15 hours ago

Kunal Kamra Row: Mumbai Police To Issue 2nd Summons In ‘Traitor’ Joke Case Today

The Mumbai Police on Wednesday are preparing to issue a second summon to stand-up comedian…

15 hours ago