Categories: Other Courts

Delhi High Court: Disclosure Of Documents Regarding Grant Of Sanction For Prosecution U/S 45(1) UAPA Can Be Exempted Under RTI Act

The Delhi High Court in the case Ehtesham Qutubuddin Siddique v. CPIO, Ministry of Home Affairs observed and has dismissed a plea filed by a convict in the Mumbai Twin Blast case (7/11 Bomb Blast case), wherein challenging an order passed by the Central Information Commission (CIC) denying him information regarding the proposal and all documents concerning grant of sanction for prosecution under section 45(1) of the Unlawful Activity (Prevention) Act (UAPA).

In the present case, Ehtesham Qutubuddin Siddique was convicted under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 and National Investigation Act, 2008 and he is presently serving his sentence in Nagpur Central Prison since July, 2006.

While upholding the view taken by CPIO of Ministry of Home Affairs, the CIC had found that the disclosures would stand exempted under section 8(1)(a) of the RTI Act.

The bench comprising of Justice Yashwant Varma while upholding the CIC order was of the view that bearing in mind the provisions made in Section 45 of the UAP Act, the Court is of the firm opinion that the disclosures that were being sought and in the broad terms as were prayed for in the application, the respondents rightly invoked Section 8(1)(a) of the RTI Act.

It has been rejected by the court that the argument of petitioner’s counsel that the CIC was obliged to consider whether the provisions of section 10 of the RTI Act would apply and that whether certain aspects of the information sought were severable, thereby falling outside the scope of section 8(1)(a) of the RTI Act.

However, the Court reasoned that the petitioner had, even on a prima facie footing, failed to establish what information that may ultimately lead to the issuance of the notification under section 45 of the UAP Act would also be severable.

The Court ordered that the writ petition lacks merit and the same shall stand dismissed.

The post Delhi High Court: Disclosure Of Documents Regarding Grant Of Sanction For Prosecution U/S 45(1) UAPA Can Be Exempted Under RTI Act appeared first on The Daily Guardian.

- -

Recent Posts

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay HC To Protect His Personality Rights

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…

2 months ago

Bribery Case: CBI Arrests NHIDCL Executive Director

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Slew Of Directions On Green Crackers Issue

The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…

2 months ago

INX Media Case: Delhi HC Relaxes Travel Restrictions On Karti Chidambaram

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Rules Lawyers’ Offices Not Commercial Establishments; Quashes NDMC Case Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel To Dubai For Diwali Event

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…

2 months ago