Categories: Other Courts

‘Duomatic principle’ is applicable even in Indian context in Company Law: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court in the case Mahima Datla vs Renuka Datla observed and stated that it will be applicable even in the Indian context, if the same is consented by all members ‘strict adherence to a statutory requirement may be dispensed with if it is demonstrated in the Duomatic Principle. It was therefore held that G.V. Rao never seized to be a Director of the Company in view of the acquiescence by Dr. Datla and he had withdrawn his resignation prior to its acceptance, the resignation dated 6th April 2013 was clearly not accepted by Mr. G.V. Rao, as it is clearly being showed by her conduct and there is overwhelming evidence to show that Dr. Datla had accepted Mr. G.V. Rao back into the Board, in this case the court noted. anything the members of a company can do by formal resolution in a general meeting, they can also do informally, if all of them assent to it, as stated briefly in the Duomatic Principle as derived from the decision In Re: Duomatic Ltd further the court noted the case of Salmon v. Salmon Co. Ltd, as it was held in that case if a company is bound in a matter intra vires by the unanimous agreement of its members. As In Re the court noted that the Duomatic Principle as derived from the decision. Mr. G.V. Rao continued to carry on as the Director in view of the acquiescence by Dr. Renuka Datla? And weather can the Duomatic Principle can be invoked to state that the issue of resignation of the Director had lapsed, as one of the issues being raise in the appeal filled before the Apex Court. The High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh allowed the Company appeal filed by Dr. Datla and the court further issued the various directions as this petition was dismiised by the Board as only to ensure Dr. Datla doesn’t have sufficient shareholding to maintain a petition under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1950, as it was being approached by Dr. Datla to the Company Law Board complaining that the holding of board meetings was illegal as an attempt was made to increase the number of members in the Company. there is no protest by Dr. Renuka Datla regarding attendance of Mr. G.V. Rao. Dr. Renuka Datla also participated in the Board Meetings dated 22nd August 2013 and 25th September 2013, without any protest for continuation of Mr. G.V. Rao as its Director as in the resolution passed. The latter which was placed in the meeting of the Board on 9th April 2013, seeking withdrawal of his resignation as on 6th April 2013, G.V Rao submitted his resignation letter and further which it was later withdrawn by G.V Rao on 9th April 2013. As on 20th March 2013 the late Dr. Vijay Kumar Datla as the directors of the Company were Biological E. Ltd are Dr. Renuka Datla and one G.V Rao. The bench comprising of Justice Vineet Saran and the justice JK Maheshwari clarified that the said principle is only applicable in those cases wherein bona fide transactions are involved and that ‘Fraud’ is a clear exception.

- -

Recent Posts

Shambhu Border Protest: SC Expresses Concern Over Dallewal’s Health, Says Top Court’s Doors Always Open For Farmers

The Supreme Court on Wednesday expressed concern over the health of farmers' leader Dallewal and…

15 hours ago

Delhi HC To Hear Raghav Chadha’s Petition Against Bungalow Eviction On Dec 19

The Delhi High Court will hear AAP MP Raghav Chadha’s plea on December 19, where…

15 hours ago

“Court Open To Farmers’ Suggestions After Rejection Of Punjab Govt Committee”: SC

The Supreme Court on Wednesday stated that its doors were “always open” to the demands…

16 hours ago

Delhi HC Orders Virtual Appearance Of 2 Accused In MCOCA Case Involving Naresh Balyan

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday directed the virtual presence of Rohit and Sachin Chikara,…

17 hours ago

Delhi HC Issues Notice To ED On Leena Paulose’s Bail Plea

The Delhi High Court has issued a notice to the ED regarding the bail application…

18 hours ago

Supreme Court Grants Co-Accused Time To Respond In Yasin Malik Trial Transfer Case

The Supreme Court on Wednesday granted 2 weeks to the co-accused in the Yasin Malik…

19 hours ago