Egra Blast: Calcutta HC Directs CID To Register Case Under Explosive Substances Act

The Calcutta High Court on Thursday directed the State Crime Investigation Department (CID) to open an investigation into the explosion at a firecracker factory in Egra under the Explosive Substances Act.

A bench of Chief Justice TS Sivagnanam and Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya also directed the West Bengal government to follow the provisions of Section 6 of the National Investigation Agency Act (NIA act), which requires the State government to report to the Central government if a ‘scheduled offence’ occurs in the state.

“We are of the prima facie view that provisions of the Explosive Substances Act will be attracted. Therefore, we order the State CID to invoke the said provisions and adhere to the provisions of the NIA act and report in this regard be placed before us on June 12,” the bench directed.

It, however, refused to transfer the investigation to the NIA directly. It also refused to order paramilitary forces to be deployed in the Egra region.

“There is no material on record to indicate any law-and-order situation in the area thus no question of deploying paramilitary forces. However, if the State thinks that a situation may arise, it would be free to deploy forces to maintain law and order,” the bench stated.

The order was passed in response to a public interest litigation (PIL) petition filed by BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari, who requested that the NIA investigate the case. Adhikari claimed that the State Police purposefully avoided invoking provisions of the Explosive Substances Act.

The PIL petition emphasized that at least nine people were killed in the incident.

Appearing for the State, Advocate General SN Mookerjee stated that the incident occurred in a fireworks factory and that the investigation was initially conducted by local police but was later transferred to the State CID. He also stated that some people were arrested and that the CID is continuing to investigate the case.

The NIA’s Deputy Solicitor General Billwadal Bhattacharyya argued that because a scheduled offense was committed, the investigation should be turned over to the NIA.

The bench refused to pass any order to transfer the investigation.

The division bench scheduled the matter for further hearing for 12th June, when the State CID will present its ‘action-taken report’ to the Court.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

10 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

10 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

10 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

11 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

11 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

11 hours ago