Gujarat HC Orders Installation Of CCTVs In Registry, Courtrooms After Advocate Found Tampering With Case

The Gujarat High Court has recently issued an order directing the Registrar of the High Court to promptly finalize the installation of CCTV cameras in the Registry in a strategic manner.

The aim here is to ensure the safeguarding of court documents against tampering, as seen in the case of Dharmesh Jivanlal Gurjar v. State of Gujarat.

During the proceedings, the registrar informed Justice Sandeep Bhatt that deliberate interference occurred, intending to prevent the inclusion of a case on the ‘admission board’ of the judge. Justice Bhatt previously hinted at issuing stringent orders in this matter on October 9.

The judge noted in the order, “hence, the petitioner, a practicing advocate, and others in his close circle are now under scrutiny for engaging in such practices, particularly within the Debts Recovery Tribunal, manipulating legal processes and engaging in unfair practices.”

The Court emphasized that such actions constitute a clear attempt to disrupt the administration of justice, especially within the Registry of the state’s highest court, stating, “Such unscrupulous individuals must be held accountable.”

However, the judge acknowledged that due to inadequate CCTV coverage, conclusive evidence couldn’t be gathered in the present case.

The case in question involved Dharmesh Gurjar, initially charged with soliciting a ₹2 lakh bribe while serving as a court-appointed commissioner for the Debts Recovery Tribunal Ahmedabad. In 2020, Gurjar filed a petition to dismiss the case.

Previously on October 9, Justice Bhatt, declined the plea and, in the event of withdrawal, directed the Bar Council of Gujarat to initiate proceedings against Gurjar for professional misconduct.

In the recent order, the Court highlighted that in 2016, the then Chief Justice granted permission for strategic CCTV installation in all judicial departments of the Registry to ensure the safety of judicial proceedings.

Despite specific approval, no progress was made, as revealed on April 19, 2023.

Expressing concern over the lack of development, Justice Bhatt emphasized, “This is a very disturbing state of affairs on the side of the administration of the High Court.”

The Court lamented the absence of progress even after the incident and instructed, “This situation can’t be tolerated and continued any further.” The Registrar General, along with the Registrars (Vigilance) and (Judicial), were directed to coordinate with the Chief Justice’s additional secretary to expedite the CCTV installation by January 15, 2024.

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

12 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

12 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

12 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

13 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

13 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

13 hours ago