Gyanvapi Survey: Varanasi Court Grants ASI One More Week to Submit Report

The Varanasi district court on Monday granted an additional week to the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to furnish a scientific survey report for the Gyanvapi mosque complex.

District Judge A K Vishvesh scheduled the next hearing for December 18, marking the sixth extension granted by the court for the ASI to file its survey report.

Madan Mohan Yadav, the counsel for the Hindu side, informed the court that the ASI expressed its inability to submit the report on Monday, citing the ill health of its superintending archaeologist, Avinash Mohanty, who experienced a sudden increase in blood pressure and could not attend the court.

Previously, the court had provided additional time to the ASI on September 6, October 5, November 2, November 17, and November 30.

The ASI initiated the survey in the barricaded area of the Gyanvapi premises on August 4, following court orders to determine whether the 17th-century mosque was constructed over a pre-existing structure of a Hindu temple.

On November 30, the district court had instructed the ASI to submit the survey report of the Gyanvapi complex by December 11. In its application, the ASI stated that the assimilation of information generated by different experts and tools is a slow process, requiring more time to complete the report.

Earlier, on November 2, the ASI informed the court that it had “completed” the survey but needed additional time to compile the report, including details of the equipment used. The court then granted an extension until November 17. Subsequently, due to the non-availability of the technical report, the ASI sought 15 more days, and the district judge instructed the submission of the report by November 28.

The ASI is conducting a scientific survey of the Gyanvapi premises, adjacent to the Kashi Vishwanath temple, to determine whether the 17th-century mosque was constructed over a pre-existing structure of a Hindu temple.

The Allahabad High Court had upheld the Varanasi district court order, ruling that the survey was “necessary in the interest of justice” and would benefit both the Hindu and Muslim sides in the dispute. The Gyanvapi committee objected to the survey, alleging unauthorized digging and debris accumulation, leading to concerns about the structure’s stability.

The committee had also approached the Supreme Court against the high court’s order, but on August 4, the apex court refused to stay the order, allowing the ASI to conduct the survey without invasive acts such as excavations.