Categories: Other Courts

ITAT: Payment Towards Employee’s Contribution To Provident Fund After Due Date Is Not Allowable As Deduction

Asstt. Director of Income Tax observed and has held that payment towards an contribution of an employee to the provident fund after the due date is not allowable as a deduction.
The two-member bench comprising of Judicial Member, Sandeep Singh Karhail and the Accountant Member, Om Prakash Kant in the case observed and has relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Checkmate Services (P.) Ltd, wherein the court has ruled that the non-obstante clause under Section 43B or anything contained in that provision would not absolve the assessee from its liability for depositing the contribution of employee on or before the due date as a condition for the deduction.
The return has been filed by the appellant or assessee of income on 10/02/2021, wherein the court declared a total income of Rs.459,03,58,100. The return was also being processed after an addition of Rs. 6,30,42,740 which was being made on account of delayed payment towards the employee’s contribution to the provident fund under Section 36(1)(va).
The appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed by CIT. If the employer fails for depositing the entire amount towards the employees’ contribution on account of the provident fund with the concerned department on or before the due date, the said assessee is not being entitled for the said compensation.
It has also been noted by the ITAT that the employee’s contribution to the provident fund was deposited by the assessee after the due date prescribed under the relevant statute but within the due date for filing the income tax return.
It has also been ruled by the ITAT that the claim of the taxpayer’s of deduction for the employee’s contribution to PF and ESI was incorrect, necessitating a prima facie adjustment.

The post ITAT: Payment Towards Employee’s Contribution To Provident Fund After Due Date Is Not Allowable As Deduction appeared first on The Daily Guardian.

- -

Recent Posts

Wrestlers Sexual Harassment Case: Victim’s 8-Hour Cross-Examination Concludes

The Rouse Avenue court has recently completed the recording of a statement from one of…

5 mins ago

SC Forms SIT To Probe Animal Fat Claims In Tirupati Laddus

The Supreme Court on Friday has established an independent special investigation team to investigate allegations…

21 mins ago

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

18 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

18 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

18 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

19 hours ago