Karnataka HC Quashes Abetment Charge Against Deceased Woman’s Husband’s Friend

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Karnataka High Court has recently dismissed the abetment to suicide charges filed against a man accused of causing the suicide of his friend’s wife by making false allegations about her character.

In a ruling by Justice M Nagaprasanna, a single judge bench observed that none of the necessary elements to establish an offense punishable under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) were present. The court stated that for an offense to be punishable under Section 306, the ingredients outlined in Section 107 of the IPC, which deals with abetment, must be satisfied.

The deceased woman’s mother had accused her son-in-law (accused No.1) and the petitioner (the husband’s friend) of being responsible for her daughter’s death. However, the petitioner argued that the complaint and the summary of the charge sheet failed to indicate any elements of the offense under Section 306 of the IPC.

The prosecution opposed the plea, contending that the offense alleged was serious and fell under Section 306 of the IPC, and therefore, the petitioner should face trial.

The court held that the petitioner, being a friend of accused No.1 and not a family member, could not be charged under Section 498(A) of the IPC. Upon reviewing the complaint and charge sheet, the court concluded that none of the necessary ingredients for establishing an offense under Section 306 of the IPC were present.

The court referred to relevant case precedents, including Kanchan Sharma v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2021) and S.S. Chheena v. Vijay Kumar Mahajan (2010), which emphasized that abetment requires an active or direct act intended to push the deceased to commit suicide.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the court concluded that the abetment required for an offense under Section 306 of the IPC was absent. Consequently, the court allowed the petitioner’s plea, noting that the trial, if continued, would likely result in the petitioner’s acquittal due to the lack of necessary elements.

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare
Meera Verma

Recent Posts

“Will Maintain Decency In Shows”: Podcaster Ranveer Allahbadia In Undertaking To SC

Podcaster Ranveer Allahbadia, popularly known as BeerBiceps, filed an undertaking in the Supreme Court on…

12 hours ago

Gold Smuggling Case: Actress Ranya Rao Seeks Bail From Karnataka HC

Kannada actress Ranya Rao on Tuesday filed a bail petition in the Karnataka High Court…

13 hours ago

SC Declines To Entertain Mahua Moitra’s Plea Seeking Transparency In Financial Markets

The Supreme Court on Tuesday has directed Trinamool Congress (TMC) Member of Parliament Mahua Moitra…

13 hours ago

Ex-Ruler’s Heirs Move Delhi HC Over Rent For Bikaner House

The heirs of late Maharaja Dr. Karni Singh filed an appeal in the Delhi High…

13 hours ago

Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration’s Freeze On Federal Funding

The federal judge on Tuesday blocked the Trump administration’s attempt to freeze federal funding, delivering…

13 hours ago

Sexual Assault Case: Bombay HC Denies Bail To School Bus Driver

The Bombay High Court has denied bail to a school bus driver who was arrested…

15 hours ago