Categories: Other Courts

Karnataka HC Upholds Single Bench Order Allowing Only Mujawar To Perform Rituals At Datta Peeta

The Karnataka High Court dismissed an appeal on Monday against a Single Judge’s order that invalidated the State’s decision to allow only a Mujawar (Muslim Priest) to perform rituals at the Datta Peeta.

The State Government had ordered that only a Mujawar designated by Shah Khadri was authorised to enter “Sri Guru Dattathreya Swamy Peeta”, (a holy cave shrine in Chikmaguluru which is revered both by Hindus and Muslim communities) and to distribute ‘teertha’ to both Hindus and Muslims.

The Datta Peeta is also called “Sree Gurudattathreya Bababudnaswamy Dargha” cave in Karnataka.

A single bench of Justice PS Dinesh Kumar in September 2021, deemed this to be a blatant violation of both communities’ rights granted by Article 25 of the Indian Constitution.

The plea was denied today by a division bench of Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Vijaykumar A Patil.

The single Judge had remanded the case to the State government with the instruction to reexamine it in conformity with the law, without reference to the High-Level Committee’s report.

It was mentioned,

“Despite the fact that the Endowment Commissioner’s recordings of a large number of devotees, including the Mujawar who worked during 1975, show that both Hindus and Muslims were worshipping according to their respective customs, the State Government has chosen to accept the High Level Committee’s recommendation to reject the Endowment Commissioner’s Report. The High Level Committee Report is not free from the vice of bias.”

Justice Kumar further added, “First, the State has violated the Hindu Community’s right to have pooja and archana performed in accordance with their beliefs through the challenged decree. Second, the State government has forced the Mujawar to perform ‘paduka pooja’ and light ‘nanda deepa,’ which is against his faith. Both of these activities are gross violations of the rights granted by Article 25 of the Indian Constitution.”

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

10 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

10 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

10 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

11 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

11 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

11 hours ago