Categories: Other Courts

KERALA HIGH COURT EXTENDS STAY ON VIGILANCE COURT’S ORDER DIRECTING STATE TO PRODUCE FILES IN BREWERY LICENCE CASE

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Kerala High Court in the case State of Kerala v. Ramesh Chennithala observed and extended its stay on the Thiruvanathapuram vigilance court order, wherein the court had directed the State to produce the files related to the brewery allotment corruption case.

The bench comprising of Justice K. Babu observed and has extended the stay while considering a plea filed by the State Government challenging the vigilance court order.

In the present case, it pertains to the alleged graft in the issuance of brewery licences by the previous administration of the ruling party. Thus, the approvals for breweries were allegedly given to three distilleries but it was revoked after the opposition challenged the same.

It was observed that the Senior Congress Leader Ramesh Chennithala thereafter approached the Vigilance Court alleging nepotism and corruption in the allocation of the licences of breweries from 2016 to 2021 and had named former Excise Minister T.P. Ramakrishnan and Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan as respondents. Documents were sought by Chennithala relating to the case under Section 17 A of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Earlier, the plea was allowed by the Thiruvananthapuram Special Viligance Court, wherein directing the Principal Secretary (Tax) to submit the government files pertaining to the sanction given for the said breweries.

While challenging the same, the State had moved the High Court. It was also prayed by the State that the High Court be pleased to quash all the proceedings pending before the Vigilance court in the case.

Further, it was argued that the complaint filed by the Congress leader did not disclose any offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act while adding that the Vigilance court had no power to conduct an inquiry over a private complaint without production of sanction from the State in the present matter.

Accordingly, the matter will be heard on 9th August.

- -

Recent Posts

SC Ruling Paves Way For Visually Impaired Judges; Yavnika Shares Her Experience

Supreme Court recently opened up the doors for visually impaired candidates in judiciary by striking…

15 hours ago

Supreme Court To Hear Plea To Debar Poll Candidates Charged For Serious Offences On Mar 18

The Supreme Court is set to hear a plea on March 18 that seeks to…

15 hours ago

Bombay HC Grants Pension Benefits To Former Judge Pushpa Ganediwala

The Bombay High Court has ruled in favor of former Additional Judge Pushpa Ganediwala, granting…

16 hours ago

Bombay HC Sets Aside Complaint Against Kailash Kher For Hurting Religious Feelings

The Bombay High Court has dismissed a complaint against singer Kailash Kher, which alleged that…

16 hours ago

Uttarakhand HC Stays Proposed Felling Of 3,300 Trees In Shivalik Elephant Reserve

The Uttarakhand High Court has put a temporary halt on the felling of 3,300 trees…

17 hours ago

“Notify Posts For Special Education Teachers By March 28”: Supreme Court To States, UTs

The Supreme Court has directed all states and Union Territories to notify the sanctioned posts…

19 hours ago