Categories: Other Courts

K’taka HC Dismisses NHAI Appeal Due to Delay in Challenging Court Order

The Karnataka High Court has recently dismissed an appeal filed by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) due to its delayed in challenging the order.

The NHAI sought to challenge the order, which was issued under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act by a Sessions Court in Mandya on March 30, 2021. However, the NHAI’s appeal was lodged after a delay of 605 days.

The landowner, Meera Shivalingaiah, had already initiated an execution petition to enforce the Sessions Court’s ruling by the time the NHAI filed its appeal in the High Court. The NHAI had previously submitted objections to the execution petition and subsequently approached the High Court to challenge the Sessions Court’s decision.

In response to the appeal, Shivalingaiah argued that the reasons provided- notably that the matter was sent for legal opinion and the file could not be located – were insufficient to warrant condoning the delay.

A single judge Justice HP Sandesh while hearing the matter referenced a Supreme Court judgment and underscored that the involvement of the government does not warrant automatic condonation of delay. The Court stressed that a different standard cannot be established for condoning delay solely based on government involvement. The judgment highlighted that the NHAI had a two-year window to act and was aware of the execution petition’s filing. Despite participating in the execution petition and submitting objections on June 2, 2022, the NHAI did not promptly file the appeal.

“In the case on hand, no doubt the appeal is filed by the National Highway Authority and there was no need to take opinion for a period of two years and apart from that even appellants had the knowledge about filing of execution petition and in the said execution petition participated and filed a statement of objections on 2.6.2022 itself and even immediately after filing a statement of objections appeal was not filed,” the bench stated.

The High Court’s decision stands as a notable affirmation of the importance of timely action, irrespective of government involvement, in legal proceedings.

 

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Punjab & Haryana HC Notice To Jindal Law School Over AI-Generated Exam Claims

The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Tuesday has issued a notice to Jindal Global…

8 hours ago

ED Files Money Laundering Complaint Against Charanjit Singh Bajaj, 4 Others

The ED on Tuesday has filed a Prosecution Complaint before the Special Court in Mohali…

8 hours ago

Pune Porsche Case: SC Rejects Anticipatory Bail To Father Of Minor Driver’s Friend

The Supreme Court on Tuesday denied bail to Arunkumar Devnath Singh, whose son is a…

9 hours ago

SC Dumps Plea Against Quashing LOC For Sushant Singh Rajput’s Ex-House Help

The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed the Centre's appeal against a Bombay High Court order…

10 hours ago

Rape Case: SC Issues Notice On Ex-Army Officer’s Plea For Quashing Charge sheet

The Supreme Court on Tuesday has agreed to review a plea from retired Army Captain…

10 hours ago

Chhattisgarh NAN Scam: FIR Against 2 Retired IAS Officers, Former AG

The Chhattisgarh Anti-Corruption Bureau on Tuesday has registered a case against 2 retired IAS officers…

10 hours ago