Kunal Kamra Challenge To IT Rules Amendment: Central Govt. Tells Bombay HC Fact Check Unit Won’t Be Notified Till July 5

The Central government today informed the Bombay High Court that it’ll not notify about the formation of the fact-checking body under the IT Rules till July 5.

For identifying and tagging what is considered false or fake online news with respect to any activity of the Central government.

Therefore, the statement made before a division bench of Justices GS Patel and Neela Gokhale in response to a plea by a stand-up comic Kunal Kamra challenging to the recent amendments to the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 (IT Rules 2021).

The Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh and advocates Aditya Thakker and DP Singh appeared for the Union government have made the statement on specific instruction.

Therefore, he requested the division bench to list the plea for directions on June 8, 2023.

Senior Advocates Darius Khambata and Arti Raghavan, who appeared for Kamra, opposed the adjournment raising apprehension for the notification once it comes out, will apply to content retrospectively.
However, the court didn’t find this a reason to immediately hear a plea for the prayer on stay or suspension of rules amendment.

The court recorded in its order that, “The rule will not be operable for fact check unit till it is notified. Even if the matter is heard for ad-interim, it will require a full hearing, covering all ground and that is likely to be heard for final disposal. We do not see why the same material has to be heard twice when it can be disposed off at the stage of admission.”

The plea is now listed for a hearing on June 8.

Then, Kamra moved to the Court challenging the revised Rule 3(1)(b)(v) and seeking a declaration that Rule 3(i)(II)(A), (C) to the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Amendment Rules, 2023 be held ultra vires section 79 of the Information Technology Act and Article 14 and 19(1)(a), (g) of the Constitution.

Furthermore, his contention is that the amendment to the rule will lead to telecom service providers and social media intermediaries to take action against content flagged by the fact-checking unit.
After failing this, they would lose the safe harbour protection under Section 79 of the Information Technology Act (ITA).

MeitY’s affidavit has been opposed to the petition stating that false and misleading information could impact electoral democracy and weaken the trust of citizens in democratic institutions.

However, the division bench expressed its prima facie opinion that as opposed to the affidavit, the rules didn’t seem to offer protection to fair criticism of the government like parody and satire.

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Rajasthan HC Quashes SC/ST Case Against Actress Shilpa Shetty

The Rajasthan High Court on Thursday quashed a complaint filed under the SC/ST (Prevention of…

13 hours ago

Allahabad HC Turns Down Appeal Seeking Appointment Of Receiver For Jaigurudev Sanstha

The Allahabad High Court on Thursday has dismissed an appeal filed by the Jaigurudev Dharma…

13 hours ago

Shivaji Statue Collapse Case: Bombay HC Grants Bail To Consultant Chetan Patil

The Bombay High Court granted bail to consultant Chetan Patil on Thursday in connection with…

14 hours ago

Excise Policy Case: Delhi HC Refuses To Stay Trial Against Arvind Kejriwal

The Delhi High Court on Thursday declined to stay the trial proceedings against former Delhi…

14 hours ago

AP Assembly Passes Resolution To Set Up HC Bench In Kurnool

The Andhra Pradesh Assembly on Thursday passed a resolution to establish a permanent High Court…

15 hours ago

Lesbian Couple Desiring Child Gets Bail In Kidnapping Of Minor Girl

The Bombay High Court on Thursday granted bail to a lesbian couple arrested for allegedly…

15 hours ago