National

Lawyers Can’t Go On Strike Or Abstain From Judicial Works: SC

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Supreme Court today said that lawyers can’t go on strike or abstain from work and directed all high courts to constitute a grievance redressal committee at the state level headed by the chief justice.

The division bench of Justices MR Shah and Ahsanuddin Amanullah stated that a separate grievance redressal committee be constituted at the district court level to provide a forum, where lawyers could seek redressal of their genuine grievances related to procedural changes in filing or listing of cases or misbehavior of member of the lower judiciary.

The bench said that “We once again reiterate that no member of the bar can go on strike…Time and again this court has emphasized that advocates going on strike or abstaining from their work hampers judicial work.”

The court disposed of an application filed by the District Bar Association of Dehradun seeking an appropriate forum for the redressal of their complaints and directed the registry to send a copy of this order to the registrar general of all high courts for taking steps in accordance with the order.

Justice Shah stated if members of the bar have some genuine grievance or face difficulty because of the procedural changes in filing and listing of matters or any genuine grievance pertaining to the misbehavior of members of the lower judiciary, they can very well make a representation for redressal of genuine grievance by some forum so that such strikes could be avoided.

It said that the forum should be a place where members of the bar can vent their grievances.

Further, it said, “Therefore, we request all high courts to constitute a grievance redressal committee in their respective high courts which may be headed by the chief justice and such a grievance redressal committee should consist of two other senior judges–one each from the judicial services and one from the bar–to be nominated by the chief justice as well as the advocate general of the state, chairman of the bar council of the state and the president of the high court bar association.”

The bench stated that the high courts may also constitute a similar grievance redressal committee at the district court level.

The bench said that “It is observed that the grievance redressal committee will consider the genuine grievances related to the difference of opinion or dissatisfaction due to procedural changes in filing and listing of the matter in respective high courts or any district courts in their respective states and any genuine grievance pertaining to misbehavior of any member of lower judiciary provided such grievance must be genuine and not to put any pressure on any judicial officer.”

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

‘Rippling’ Co-Founder Moves Madras HC Alleging Police Harassment Amid Escalating Feud With Wife

Prasanna Sankar, the co-founder of Rippling, has approached the Madras High Court with allegations that…

13 hours ago

Hyderabad Court Sentences Life Imprisonment To Priest Who Killed Lover, Sealed Body In Septic Tank

A Hyderabad court has sentenced Venkata Sai Surya Krishna, a priest, to life imprisonment for…

13 hours ago

Sambhal Violence: UP Court Rejects Interim Bail To Shahi Jama Masjid President

A local court on Thursday rejected the interim bail plea of Zafar Ali, the president…

14 hours ago

DHC To Review AAP’s Somnath Bharti’s Petition Against BJP’s Satish Upadhyay’s Election Win

Aam Aadmi Party leader Somnath Bharti on Thursday has filed a petition in the Delhi…

15 hours ago

SC To Decide Maintainability Of Writ Petition Filed To Reconsider Death Penalty Based On 2022 ‘Manoj’ Verdict

The Supreme Court of India on Thursday to decide whether it can entertain a petition…

16 hours ago

Anti-CAA Case: Activist Sharjeel Imam Challenges Saket Court’s Order; HC Issues Notice

Activist Sharjeel Imam has approached the Delhi High Court on Thursday to challenge a recent…

16 hours ago