Categories: Other Courts

Madras HC Dismisses Temple Archaka Appointments Made Against Agama

The Madras High Court recently dismissed the appointment of three persons as Archakas at the Arulmighu Subramaniya Swamy Thirukoil in Trichy, citing that the appointments were not in accordance with the Agama.

The Assistant Commissioner, who served as the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department’s “Fit Person” for the temple, made the appointments.

A bench of Justice GR Swaminathan noted that the temple was an agamic temple administered by Kamika Agama. As a result, only Adi Saivars/Sivachariyars/Gurukkals who have obtained knowledge solely through the Agamas are eligible and qualified to be appointed as Archakas for the aforementioned temple.

The single bench also emphasised that the Agamic prescription does not violate Article 17 of the Constitution by pointing out that a Smartha Brahmin cannot be nominated as an Archaka of the temple.

The Agama is not unconstitutional because there is no disqualification based solely on membership in a Scheduled Caste.

The bench annulled the appointments, ruling that it was a matter of safeguarding the fundamental rights of a religious denomination, and ordered that the petitioners who questioned the appointments be appointed as Archakas.

It further observed that the petitioners (K Karthick and another) had been serving as Archakas at the aforementioned temple for more than a decade, despite not being formally appointed by the trustee or a suitable person.

“These are matters of tradition, custom and usage. The trustee/fit person of Arulmighu Subramaniya Swamy Thirukoil, Kumaravayalur, Srirangam Taluk, Trichy is directed to consider appointing the petitioners herein to the post of Archaka. The petitioners belong to the denomination in question. They have been discharging the duties of a temple priest for all these years. There is no justification in not considering their case. If there are other candidates hailing from the said denomination, then there can be selection among them. That is not the case here. A decision shall be taken by the trustee/fit person of the temple for appointing the petitioners as Archakas within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order”, the order stated.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Centre Opposes Ex-Judges Panel To Monitor Stubble Burning In SC

The Centre on Friday opposed a proposal in the Supreme Court to form a committee…

7 hours ago

“It’s A Celebration For Us”: Delhi HC Bar Association Felicitates CJI Sanjiv Khanna

The Delhi High Court Bar Association on Friday honored Chief Justice of India Justice Sanjiv…

7 hours ago

International Criminal Court Issues Arrest Warrant For Israeli PM Netanyahu

The International Criminal Court has recently issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,…

7 hours ago

Cal HC Stays Demolition Of Illegal Constructions In WB’s Mandarmoni

The Calcutta High Court on Friday granted an interim stay on the demolition of alleged…

8 hours ago

SC To Pass Order On Pleas To Efface Words ‘Secular’, ‘Socialist’ From Preamble

The Supreme Court on Friday announced that it would deliver its order on November 25…

8 hours ago

Air Pollution: SC Questions Delhi Govt On Truck Entry Amid GRAP-4 Restrictions

The Supreme Court raised concerns on Friday about the "drastic" consequences of the GRAP Stage…

9 hours ago