Other Courts

Maha Court Sentences Driver To 10 Yrs Of Rigorous Imprisonment For Raping & Blackmailing Minor

A special POCSO court in Vasai, Maharashtra has sentenced a 33-year-old driver to 10 years of rigorous imprisonment for raping and blackmailing a minor girl in 2016.

Judge SV Kongal, presiding over the court set up under the POCSO Act, convicted the driver, Sandeep Rajendraprasad Yadav, a resident of Nallasopara in Palghar district, of various offences, including rape (IPC section 376).

2 other accused, including a woman, charged with facilitating the offence of rape, were acquitted by the court due to insufficient evidence against them.

The order was pronounced on February 7 and a copy of it was made available on Friday.

Besides the POCSO Act, Yadav was also charged under relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code and the IT Act.

Furthermore, the court imposed a fine of Rs 5,000 on the convict and handed him varying terms of imprisonment, ranging from 6 months to a year, for offences under the IPC and the IT Act. All sentences will run concurrently.

During the trial, Special Public Prosecutor Jaiprakash Patil alleged that Yadav coerced the victim (age not undisclosed) into sending him money for making her a fashion model and engaging in physical relations.

According to the prosecution, Yadav blackmailed the victim with compromising images and also raped her by giving sedative-laced drink.
Yadav’s counsel Uday Patil argued for leniency, highlighting his client’s family responsibilities and peaceful conduct during the trial.

On the other hand, prosecutor Jaiprakash Patil urged the court to impose the maximum sentence, stressing the severity of the offences.

The judge, while delivering the verdict, noted the gravity of the crimes and emphasized the need for justice for the victim.

The court also ordered compensation for the victim through the District Legal Services Authority, acknowledging the financial and emotional toll suffered by the victim and her family.

The judge noted, “In present case, punishment provided under section 376(1) of the IPC is imprisonment not less than 7 years, but which may extent up to imprisonment for life which shall mean imprisonment for the remainder of that person’s natural life and shall also be liable to fine.”

The court stated that, “There are allegations of rape. Accused in the present case is aged about 33 years. He is married and has two children and old aged mother. Looking to his family background and nature of offence, I am of the view that rigorous imprisonment for 10 years for the offence punishable under section 376(1) of the Indian Penal Code would suffice the purpose.”

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Centre Opposes Ex-Judges Panel To Monitor Stubble Burning In SC

The Centre on Friday opposed a proposal in the Supreme Court to form a committee…

4 hours ago

“It’s A Celebration For Us”: Delhi HC Bar Association Felicitates CJI Sanjiv Khanna

The Delhi High Court Bar Association on Friday honored Chief Justice of India Justice Sanjiv…

4 hours ago

International Criminal Court Issues Arrest Warrant For Israeli PM Netanyahu

The International Criminal Court has recently issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,…

5 hours ago

Cal HC Stays Demolition Of Illegal Constructions In WB’s Mandarmoni

The Calcutta High Court on Friday granted an interim stay on the demolition of alleged…

5 hours ago

SC To Pass Order On Pleas To Efface Words ‘Secular’, ‘Socialist’ From Preamble

The Supreme Court on Friday announced that it would deliver its order on November 25…

6 hours ago

Air Pollution: SC Questions Delhi Govt On Truck Entry Amid GRAP-4 Restrictions

The Supreme Court raised concerns on Friday about the "drastic" consequences of the GRAP Stage…

6 hours ago