Other Courts

Maha Court Sentences Driver To 10 Yrs Of Rigorous Imprisonment For Raping & Blackmailing Minor

A special POCSO court in Vasai, Maharashtra has sentenced a 33-year-old driver to 10 years of rigorous imprisonment for raping and blackmailing a minor girl in 2016.

Judge SV Kongal, presiding over the court set up under the POCSO Act, convicted the driver, Sandeep Rajendraprasad Yadav, a resident of Nallasopara in Palghar district, of various offences, including rape (IPC section 376).

2 other accused, including a woman, charged with facilitating the offence of rape, were acquitted by the court due to insufficient evidence against them.

The order was pronounced on February 7 and a copy of it was made available on Friday.

Besides the POCSO Act, Yadav was also charged under relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code and the IT Act.

Furthermore, the court imposed a fine of Rs 5,000 on the convict and handed him varying terms of imprisonment, ranging from 6 months to a year, for offences under the IPC and the IT Act. All sentences will run concurrently.

During the trial, Special Public Prosecutor Jaiprakash Patil alleged that Yadav coerced the victim (age not undisclosed) into sending him money for making her a fashion model and engaging in physical relations.

According to the prosecution, Yadav blackmailed the victim with compromising images and also raped her by giving sedative-laced drink.
Yadav’s counsel Uday Patil argued for leniency, highlighting his client’s family responsibilities and peaceful conduct during the trial.

On the other hand, prosecutor Jaiprakash Patil urged the court to impose the maximum sentence, stressing the severity of the offences.

The judge, while delivering the verdict, noted the gravity of the crimes and emphasized the need for justice for the victim.

The court also ordered compensation for the victim through the District Legal Services Authority, acknowledging the financial and emotional toll suffered by the victim and her family.

The judge noted, “In present case, punishment provided under section 376(1) of the IPC is imprisonment not less than 7 years, but which may extent up to imprisonment for life which shall mean imprisonment for the remainder of that person’s natural life and shall also be liable to fine.”

The court stated that, “There are allegations of rape. Accused in the present case is aged about 33 years. He is married and has two children and old aged mother. Looking to his family background and nature of offence, I am of the view that rigorous imprisonment for 10 years for the offence punishable under section 376(1) of the Indian Penal Code would suffice the purpose.”

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay HC To Protect His Personality Rights

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…

2 months ago

Bribery Case: CBI Arrests NHIDCL Executive Director

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Slew Of Directions On Green Crackers Issue

The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…

2 months ago

INX Media Case: Delhi HC Relaxes Travel Restrictions On Karti Chidambaram

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Rules Lawyers’ Offices Not Commercial Establishments; Quashes NDMC Case Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel To Dubai For Diwali Event

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…

2 months ago