Other Courts

Maha Court Sentences Driver To 10 Yrs Of Rigorous Imprisonment For Raping & Blackmailing Minor

A special POCSO court in Vasai, Maharashtra has sentenced a 33-year-old driver to 10 years of rigorous imprisonment for raping and blackmailing a minor girl in 2016.

Judge SV Kongal, presiding over the court set up under the POCSO Act, convicted the driver, Sandeep Rajendraprasad Yadav, a resident of Nallasopara in Palghar district, of various offences, including rape (IPC section 376).

2 other accused, including a woman, charged with facilitating the offence of rape, were acquitted by the court due to insufficient evidence against them.

The order was pronounced on February 7 and a copy of it was made available on Friday.

Besides the POCSO Act, Yadav was also charged under relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code and the IT Act.

Furthermore, the court imposed a fine of Rs 5,000 on the convict and handed him varying terms of imprisonment, ranging from 6 months to a year, for offences under the IPC and the IT Act. All sentences will run concurrently.

During the trial, Special Public Prosecutor Jaiprakash Patil alleged that Yadav coerced the victim (age not undisclosed) into sending him money for making her a fashion model and engaging in physical relations.

According to the prosecution, Yadav blackmailed the victim with compromising images and also raped her by giving sedative-laced drink.
Yadav’s counsel Uday Patil argued for leniency, highlighting his client’s family responsibilities and peaceful conduct during the trial.

On the other hand, prosecutor Jaiprakash Patil urged the court to impose the maximum sentence, stressing the severity of the offences.

The judge, while delivering the verdict, noted the gravity of the crimes and emphasized the need for justice for the victim.

The court also ordered compensation for the victim through the District Legal Services Authority, acknowledging the financial and emotional toll suffered by the victim and her family.

The judge noted, “In present case, punishment provided under section 376(1) of the IPC is imprisonment not less than 7 years, but which may extent up to imprisonment for life which shall mean imprisonment for the remainder of that person’s natural life and shall also be liable to fine.”

The court stated that, “There are allegations of rape. Accused in the present case is aged about 33 years. He is married and has two children and old aged mother. Looking to his family background and nature of offence, I am of the view that rigorous imprisonment for 10 years for the offence punishable under section 376(1) of the Indian Penal Code would suffice the purpose.”

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Supreme Court Says “Marriage Is Relationship Built On Mutual Trust, Companionship”

The Supreme Court has upheld a decision by the Madras High Court granting a divorce…

1 day ago

Delhi HC Grants Anticipatory Bail To Lawyer In Brother’s Criminal Case

The Delhi High Court has granted transit anticipatory bail to a lawyer whose brother is…

2 days ago

Justice Madan B Lokur Appointed As Chairperson of UN Internal Justice Council

Former Supreme Court Justice Madan B Lokur has been recently named the chairperson of the…

2 days ago

Karnataka High Court Directs NLSIU To Implement 0.5% Reservation For Transgender Persons

The Karnataka High Court has recently directed the National Law School of India University (NLSIU)…

2 days ago

Allahabad HC Directs UP Vigilance To Investigate Himalayan Cooperative Housing Land Issue

The Allahabad High Court has directed the Uttar Pradesh Vigilance Department to investigate the Himalayan…

2 days ago

Allahabad HC Grants Stay On Mohammed Zubair’s Arrest In Religious Enmity Case

The Allahabad High Court on Friday issued an order staying the arrest of Mohammed Zubair,…

2 days ago