Other Courts

Maha Court Sentences Driver To 10 Yrs Of Rigorous Imprisonment For Raping & Blackmailing Minor

A special POCSO court in Vasai, Maharashtra has sentenced a 33-year-old driver to 10 years of rigorous imprisonment for raping and blackmailing a minor girl in 2016.

Judge SV Kongal, presiding over the court set up under the POCSO Act, convicted the driver, Sandeep Rajendraprasad Yadav, a resident of Nallasopara in Palghar district, of various offences, including rape (IPC section 376).

2 other accused, including a woman, charged with facilitating the offence of rape, were acquitted by the court due to insufficient evidence against them.

The order was pronounced on February 7 and a copy of it was made available on Friday.

Besides the POCSO Act, Yadav was also charged under relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code and the IT Act.

Furthermore, the court imposed a fine of Rs 5,000 on the convict and handed him varying terms of imprisonment, ranging from 6 months to a year, for offences under the IPC and the IT Act. All sentences will run concurrently.

During the trial, Special Public Prosecutor Jaiprakash Patil alleged that Yadav coerced the victim (age not undisclosed) into sending him money for making her a fashion model and engaging in physical relations.

According to the prosecution, Yadav blackmailed the victim with compromising images and also raped her by giving sedative-laced drink.
Yadav’s counsel Uday Patil argued for leniency, highlighting his client’s family responsibilities and peaceful conduct during the trial.

On the other hand, prosecutor Jaiprakash Patil urged the court to impose the maximum sentence, stressing the severity of the offences.

The judge, while delivering the verdict, noted the gravity of the crimes and emphasized the need for justice for the victim.

The court also ordered compensation for the victim through the District Legal Services Authority, acknowledging the financial and emotional toll suffered by the victim and her family.

The judge noted, “In present case, punishment provided under section 376(1) of the IPC is imprisonment not less than 7 years, but which may extent up to imprisonment for life which shall mean imprisonment for the remainder of that person’s natural life and shall also be liable to fine.”

The court stated that, “There are allegations of rape. Accused in the present case is aged about 33 years. He is married and has two children and old aged mother. Looking to his family background and nature of offence, I am of the view that rigorous imprisonment for 10 years for the offence punishable under section 376(1) of the Indian Penal Code would suffice the purpose.”

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

10 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

10 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

10 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

11 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

11 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

11 hours ago