Categories: Other Courts

Maharashtra Court Denied Application Seeking Restrain Broadcast Of Besharam Rang on YouTube

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

A civil court in Maharashtra recently denied a application to restrain the broadcast of the teasers, trailers, and advertisements for Shah Rukh Khan’s film ‘Pathaan’, as well as the song ‘Besharam Rang’, on YouTube without a U/A censor certificate.

Civil Judge JD Patel, who presides over a Civil Court in Shrirampur, ruled that the plaintiff had failed to establish a prima facie case for such an injunction.

Furthermore, the Court stated that the plaintiff would suffer no loss if temporary relief is not granted.

The Court stated, “If the said relief is granted it is as good as the final relief. As a result, the requested relief cannot be granted. Furthermore, no prima facie case is established by the plaintiff’s claims. The plaintiff must present evidence to support his claim. If the application is rejected, the plaintiff will suffer no loss. Plaintiff has another option, the balance of convenience also does not lie in favour of plaintiff.”

A social worker filed an application after noticing that the U/A censor board certificate was not displayed on YouTube before the teasers, trailer, songs, and advertisements for the film Pathaan. The U/A certificate indicates that the film has been approved for unrestricted public exhibition for children under the age of twelve, subject to parental guidance.

The plaintiff argued that such publication without a U/A certificate resulted in loss to himself and society at large. He further contended that Rule 38 of the Cinematography Act makes it mandatory to show such a certificate.

However, the film’s production company argued that there was no need to display such a certificate when publishing an advertising for the film on internet on platforms such as YouTube or any OTT platform.

According to the Cinematography Act of 1953, the requirement of certification is limited to the theatrical description of the film or when the film is described in DVDs.

The Court denied the plaintiff’s application after considering these submissions in a February 8 order.

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Terror Funding Case: Delhi Court Junks Engineer Rashid’s Bail Plea

A Delhi court on Friday rejected the bail application of Lok Sabha MP from Jammu…

6 hours ago

Bombay High Court Quashes Sexual Harassment Findings Against Bank Employee

The Bombay High Court has overturned an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) report and a subsequent…

7 hours ago

Honey-Trap Scandal: Opposition BJP Members Stage Dharna In K’taka Legislative Assembly Seeking Judicial Probe

The members of the opposition BJP on Friday staged a protest in the Karnataka Legislative…

7 hours ago

Parliament Erupts Over Cash Found At Delhi HC Judge’s Residence; Calls For Judicial Accountability Intensify

The issue relating to the alleged recovery of large pile of unaccounted cash from the…

8 hours ago

Petition Filed Against Nitish Kumar In Bihar Court For Disrespecting National Anthem

A heated war of words broke out in the Bihar Assembly on Friday as ruling…

8 hours ago

Barrister Saif Accuses Sharif Family Of Financial Misconduct

Barrister Saif, the Information Adviser for Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (K-P), has accused the Sharif family of…

10 hours ago