Other Courts

Mahindra To Challenge IndiGo’s Trademark Claim Over SUV ‘6E’ In Court

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

Mahindra has announced its decision to challenge IndiGo’s claim over the “6E” trademark in court, while moving ahead with branding its new Electric Origin SUV as “BE 6”. The company revealed the BE 6e and XEV 9e electric SUVs on November 26.

Mahindra has filed for trademark registration of “BE 6e” under Class 12 (vehicles), which forms part of its electric vehicle lineup. The company clarified that the “BE” mark, representing its “Born Electric” platform, is already registered in Class 12 under Mahindra’s name and is integral to the BE 6e.

InterGlobe Aviation, the parent company of IndiGo, raised concerns regarding Mahindra’s use of “6E.” In response, Mahindra asserted that the “BE 6e” mark is entirely different from IndiGo’s “6E”, which is associated with the airline industry. “We believe ‘BE 6e’ is distinct from ‘6E’, and there is no risk of confusion,” Mahindra stated. “Our application pertains to an entirely different product category, and the unique design further emphasizes this distinction.”

Mahindra also pointed out the inconsistency in IndiGo’s stance, referencing a past instance when Tata Motors objected to the use of the name “IndiGo” by InterGlobe, given Tata’s own “Tata Indigo” car brand. “We find their objection to BE 6e inconsistent with their previous conduct,” Mahindra noted.

The company emphasized its focus on advancing electric mobility in India and ensuring a seamless customer experience. “Our priority remains to make electric vehicles more accessible to Indian consumers,” Mahindra said. The company also expressed disappointment over what it called a needless dispute between two prominent Indian businesses, which it believes detracts from mutual growth and collaboration.

Mahindra concluded that it believes IndiGo’s objection is without merit and, if left unchallenged, could establish a harmful precedent for the monopolization of short, alpha-numeric marks across industries. “This would limit business creativity and growth,” Mahindra warned. The company intends to continue pursuing the matter in court, asserting its rights to the “BE 6e” trademark.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Delhi Court Rejects BJP Leader’s Defamation Plea Against AAP’s Saurabh Bharadwaj

A Delhi court has dismissed a plea by BJP leader Suraj Bhan Chauhan seeking the…

10 hours ago

James Murray Accused Of Sending Inappropriate Messages To Minor

James Murray, one of the stars of the comedy series Impractical Jokers, is facing allegations…

11 hours ago

Mahatma Gandhi’s Great-Grandson Moves SC Against Sabarmati Ashram Redevelopment

Tushar Gandhi, the great-grandson of Mahatma Gandhi, has filed a petition in the Supreme Court…

11 hours ago

ITAT Grants Tax Exemption To Kapil Dev On ₹1.5 Crore BCCI Payment

In a significant ruling, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has recently granted tax exemption to…

12 hours ago

“Not Acceptable That Children Need To Wear Masks To Play Outside”: SC Judge Justice Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Judge Justice Vikram Nath on Saturday has raised concerns over the continued requirement…

13 hours ago

Government Criticizes ‘X’ Over Censorship Allegations In Karnataka HC

The Central government has strongly objected to claims of censorship made by Elon Musk-owned social…

13 hours ago