Other Courts

Mahindra To Challenge IndiGo’s Trademark Claim Over SUV ‘6E’ In Court

Mahindra has announced its decision to challenge IndiGo’s claim over the “6E” trademark in court, while moving ahead with branding its new Electric Origin SUV as “BE 6”. The company revealed the BE 6e and XEV 9e electric SUVs on November 26.

Mahindra has filed for trademark registration of “BE 6e” under Class 12 (vehicles), which forms part of its electric vehicle lineup. The company clarified that the “BE” mark, representing its “Born Electric” platform, is already registered in Class 12 under Mahindra’s name and is integral to the BE 6e.

InterGlobe Aviation, the parent company of IndiGo, raised concerns regarding Mahindra’s use of “6E.” In response, Mahindra asserted that the “BE 6e” mark is entirely different from IndiGo’s “6E”, which is associated with the airline industry. “We believe ‘BE 6e’ is distinct from ‘6E’, and there is no risk of confusion,” Mahindra stated. “Our application pertains to an entirely different product category, and the unique design further emphasizes this distinction.”

Mahindra also pointed out the inconsistency in IndiGo’s stance, referencing a past instance when Tata Motors objected to the use of the name “IndiGo” by InterGlobe, given Tata’s own “Tata Indigo” car brand. “We find their objection to BE 6e inconsistent with their previous conduct,” Mahindra noted.

The company emphasized its focus on advancing electric mobility in India and ensuring a seamless customer experience. “Our priority remains to make electric vehicles more accessible to Indian consumers,” Mahindra said. The company also expressed disappointment over what it called a needless dispute between two prominent Indian businesses, which it believes detracts from mutual growth and collaboration.

Mahindra concluded that it believes IndiGo’s objection is without merit and, if left unchallenged, could establish a harmful precedent for the monopolization of short, alpha-numeric marks across industries. “This would limit business creativity and growth,” Mahindra warned. The company intends to continue pursuing the matter in court, asserting its rights to the “BE 6e” trademark.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Is Legal Education Keeping Up With The Times? | Legally Speaking

Legal education in India, once a static field, is now undergoing a significant transformation. The…

5 hours ago

Does India Need A Debate On The Constitution? Insights From Sudhanshu Trivedi | Legally Speaking

In a compelling session at the Third Law and Constitution Dialogue, Rajya Sabha Member Sudhanshu…

5 hours ago

‘AI Itself Is Not Inherently Bad’: Experts Discuss Deepfakes And AI Regulation | Legally Speaking

At the 3rd Law & Constitution Dialogue, a panel of experts from diverse fields addressed…

5 hours ago

‘Inclusion Of Muslim Women On Waqf Boards A Progressive Step’: Salman Khurshid Speaks On Constitutionality of The Waqf Act | Legally Speaking

At the Legally Speaking dialogue, Senior Advocate Salman Khurshid offered an insightful analysis of the…

6 hours ago

Justice Sanjay Kaul Opens Up On The Genocide Of Kashmiri Pandits | Legally Speaking Dialogue

At the 3rd Law & Constitution Dialogue hosted by NewsX, Justice Sanjay Kaul addressed the…

6 hours ago

‘Indian Women Are Vulnerable And They Need Women-Enabling Laws’: Experts Discuss Atul Subhash Suicide Case | Legally Speaking

At the Legally Speaking dialogue on “Prenup, Divorce & Inheritance,” legal experts deliberated on the…

6 hours ago