Other Courts

Money Laundering Case: Mumbai Court Refuses Bail To Ex-Axis MF Fund Manager

A special court in Mumbai has refused bail to Viresh Joshi, former chief trader and fund manager of Axis Mutual Fund, in connection with a money laundering case.

The court emphasized that economic offences have a direct impact on the socio-economic fabric and financial systems of the country.

Special Judge R. B. Rote, while rejecting Joshi’s plea last week, said the allegations against him were grave, involving misappropriation of ₹91 crore belonging to investors. A detailed order was released on Friday. Joshi was arrested by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) last month under provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

Allegations

According to the ED, Joshi exploited his position as chief dealer by sharing confidential information about the mutual fund’s impending large trades with associates. This allowed them to gain illegal profits at the expense of investors.

The probe agency further alleged that during the COVID-19 pandemic, Joshi misused remote working permissions to expand these illegal activities. Between September 2021 and March 2022, he and his associates reportedly carried out a large-scale fraud by engaging in front-running, a practice where advance knowledge of trades is misused for personal benefit.

The ED claimed that the group generated illegal profits worth ₹30.56 crore during this period. Joshi allegedly laundered around ₹91 crore through bank accounts held by his family members, which was then used to acquire properties both in India and abroad.

Defence Arguments

Joshi, through his counsel, argued that his role at Axis Mutual Fund was largely administrative and that he had no discretionary powers over trading decisions. He pointed out that the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) had already quantified the gains from the alleged front-running at ₹30.56 crore and that the entire amount had been disgorged.

He further contended that since both SEBI and the Income Tax Department had already recovered funds, there was no remaining illicit gain, weakening the grounds for prosecution under PMLA.

Court’s Findings

The court, however, dismissed these arguments. It held that depositing ₹30.56 crore under SEBI’s order did not absolve the accused of money laundering. “Money laundering is a distinct and standalone offence,” the order stated.

The judge also noted that the ED had collected sufficient material to prima facie establish Joshi’s involvement. Considering the seriousness of the crime, the ongoing investigation, and the risk of tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses, the court refused to grant bail.

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtInternational

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay HC To Protect His Personality Rights

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…

2 months ago

Bribery Case: CBI Arrests NHIDCL Executive Director

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Slew Of Directions On Green Crackers Issue

The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…

2 months ago

INX Media Case: Delhi HC Relaxes Travel Restrictions On Karti Chidambaram

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Rules Lawyers’ Offices Not Commercial Establishments; Quashes NDMC Case Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel To Dubai For Diwali Event

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…

2 months ago