Categories: Other Courts

MP High Court: S.195(1) CrPC does not bar registration of fir or require that written complaint by public servant be filled before court

The Madhya Pradesh High Court, Indore Bench in the case Ramesh Mendola v The State Of Madhya Pradesh observed and has recently held that Section 195(1) of CrPC nowhere states that that written complaint by the public officer has to be filed before the Court. It was noted by the Court that the said provision also does not debar registration of FIR.

While rejecting to quash the FIR against the Accused/ Applicant, the bench comprising of Justice S.K. Singh observed that Section 195(1) of Cr.P.C. only says that no Court shall take cognizance of any offence punishable under Sections 172 to 188 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 except on the complaint in writing of the public servant concerned or of some other public servant concerned to whom he is administratively subordinate. In the said provision there is nothing which debars registration of FIR. It has nowhere stated that before the court the aforesaid written complaint should be filed.

FACTS OF THE CASE

A political event is organized by the applicant, the event alleging in violation of the orders passed by the executive authorities. While the gathering of people was to be limited to 100 people and it is said that the event actually hosted about 300 people who gathered and participated in the meeting without following the guidelines issued with regard to COVID-19 pandemic, corollary to the same, a compliant was made by the authority concerned to the respective SHO, who accordingly registered a case against the Applicant for offence punishable under Section 188 of the Indian Penal Code. An application was moved by the applicant to quash the FIR.

It was observed that the sole argument of the Applicant before the Court was that as per the provision under Section 195(1) CrPC, offence under Section 188 IPC can only be registered on the basis of a written complaint by a public servant to the court, whereas no such complaint was filed before the competent court. However, it was asserted that the FIR registered against him was liable to be quashed.

It was argued by the State that it was apparent from the record that the FIR was registered on the basis of a letter received from public servant concerned and a written complaint was made by the FST, Incharge 01 Sanwer, Indore. It was further submitted by him that the provision under Section 195(1) CrPC nowhere mentions that the said complaint should be filed before the court. Thus, it was asserted that the application was devoid of merit and liable to be dismissed.

The Court while examining the submissions of parties and documents on record, found merit in the arguments put forth by the State that they have complied with the provisions under Section 195(1) CrPC-

In the present case, the complainant has made a written complaint by the public servant FST Incharge, 001 Sanwer and the same has been forwarded by his superior officer i.e. Returning Officer, Legislative Constituency No.211, Sanwer. However, it cannot be said that provisions of Section 195(1) of Cr.P.C.

It was held by the court with the aforesaid observations that the case of the Applicant was devoid of merits.

Accordingly, the court dismissed the application.

- -

Recent Posts

Rape Case: Pastor Jashan Gill Surrenders In Gurdaspur Court

Self-proclaimed pastor Jashan Gill, accused in a shocking case involving the rape of a 22-year-old…

4 hours ago

Karnataka HC Defers Ranya Rao’s Bail Plea Hearing Until April 17

The Karnataka High Court on Wednesday has postponed the hearing of actor Ranya Rao’s bail…

4 hours ago

“Plea To Increase Number Of Ministers Needs Consideration”: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday said that a petition asking to increase the number…

4 hours ago

Land Case: Karnataka Bureaucrats Move Supreme Court To Halt Contempt Proceedings

The Maharashtra government on Wednesday informed the Supreme Court that the next tranche of land…

5 hours ago

COVID-19 Oxygen Scam Case: BMC Commissioner Refuses Sanction To Prosecute Officials

The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation on Tuesday informed the Bombay High Court that its municipal commissioner…

6 hours ago

“No Bail Rider Violated When Appointed Minister”: Senthil Balaji To SC

Tamil Nadu Minister and DMK leader V Senthil Balaji on Wednesday asserted before the Supreme…

6 hours ago