Categories: Other Courts

Pakistan Court Rules Toshakhana Case Against Imran Khan as Inadmissible

On July 4, Chief Justice Amir Farooq declared the Toshakhana case against Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) chief Imran Khan inadmissible.

Previously, Khan had been indicted in the Toshakhana case on May 10 by Additional Sessions Judge Humayun Dilawar, who dismissed objections regarding the case’s admissibility. Subsequently, Khan approached the Islamabad High Court (IHC), which had suspended the criminal proceedings until June 8.

After resuming the hearing in June, Justice Aamer reserved his verdict on the petition on June 23, indicating that he would address the matter following Eid ul-Adha. On July 4, Chief Justice Amir Farooq declared the Toshakhana case against Khan inadmissible, according to ARY News.

The Toshakhana refers to a department under the administrative control of the Cabinet Division, responsible for storing valuable gifts received by rulers, parliamentarians, bureaucrats, and officials from foreign heads of state, governments, and dignitaries.

The issue of Toshakhana and the sale of state gifts received by Imran Khan during his premiership from 2018 to 2022 became a significant topic in national politics after the Election Commission of Pakistan disqualified the former prime minister for making “false statements and incorrect declaration.”

Khan was accused of misusing his position to buy and sell gifts of substantial value, amounting to over Rs140 million (USD 635,000), which were in the possession of the state.

In his petition, the PTI chief objected to the filing of a complaint after the specified period, with his lawyer Khawaja Haris arguing that a complaint could only be lodged within four months of submitting the return.

However, the PTI chief recently submitted a petition seeking Justice Aamer’s recusal from the case, along with the transfer of the two Toshakhana cases to another bench for a “fair and impartial” trial. The district election commission was named as the respondent in the petition.

Meanwhile, Gohar Khan, the lawyer representing the PTI chief, hailed the verdict as a “victory,” stating that an appeal had been filed against the session judge’s decision in the Toshakhana case. He further contended that the wrong person had filed the complaint and expressed satisfaction with PTI’s success after a year of pursuing the matter in court.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

16 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

16 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

16 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

17 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

17 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

17 hours ago