Other Courts

Parliament Security Breach: All Accused Opt for Unified Legal Representation, Next Hearing on Mar 11

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

In a significant development, all six accused in the Parliament Security Breach case have opted for a change in legal representation. They will now be collectively represented by a single private counsel.

It is to be noted that all six accused were physically presented before the court during the hearing.

Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) Dr. Hardeep Kaur scheduled the next hearing for March 11, extending the judicial custody of all accused individuals until that date.

Advocate Somarjuna has been appointed to represent all the accused, replacing the previously assigned Legal Aid counsel provided by the court. Neelam Azad, in court, expressed her desire to change her counsel and highlighted her ongoing back pain, lamenting the lack of medication despite being prescribed for the past 20 days.

Responding to Azad’s concerns, the court directed her counsel to file an appropriate application seeking necessary directions to the jail authorities regarding medical care. Previously, on January 31, 2024, the accused had filed an application alleging coercion to sign numerous blank pages and endure torture, including electric shocks, during custody.

The application detailed instances where accused individuals were compelled to associate themselves with a political party on paper. Moreover, it alleged coercion during polygraph, narco, or brain mapping tests to implicate a political party or leader in their involvement.

The court has set March 11, 2024, for arguments on the application filed by the five accused individuals and has directed the Delhi Police to respond to the allegations made therein. Neelam Azad had previously informed the court about being forced to sign 52 blank papers by a female officer, prompting her legal representative to submit a formal application.

All individuals involved in the Parliament Security Breach case have been apprehended. The case revolves around a security breach incident that occurred on December 13, coinciding with the anniversary of the Parliament Attack.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Madras HC Grants Interim Anticipatory Bail To Comedian Kunal Kamra

The Madras High Court on Friday granted stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra interim transit anticipatory bail…

43 minutes ago

“Restaurants Can’t Force Customers To Pay Service Charge”: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court on Friday ruled that payment of service charge by customers at…

59 minutes ago

Delhi HC Orders Engineer Rashid To Deposit Over ₹3.35 Lakh To Attend Parliament

The Delhi High Court on Friday directed Jammu and Kashmir Member of Parliament (MP), Abdul…

1 hour ago

Kerala HC Dissolves Petitions Seeking Probe Against CM Pinarayi Vijayan And His Daughter

The Kerala High Court on Friday dismissed 2 petitions seeking an investigation into allegations of…

2 hours ago

Supreme Court Sets Aside Plea For FIR Against Justice Yashwant Varma, Says Inquiry Ongoing

The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a petition seeking an FIR against Justice Yashwant Varma,…

4 hours ago

Staff Appointment Case: Madhya Pradesh HC Gives AIIMS Bhopal ‘Last Chance’ To Respond

The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Friday issued a “last chance” to the All Indian…

4 hours ago