Other Courts

Parliament Security Breach: Delhi Police Seeks Permission for Polygraph Tests

The Special Cell of Delhi Police on Thursday moved an application in the Patiala House Court, seeking authorization to conduct a polygraph test on all the individuals apprehended in the Parliament Security Breach Case.

The Additional Sessions Judge, Dr. Hardeeep Kaur, deferred the matter to January 2, 2024, observing the absence of the legal aid counsel representing some of the accused.

During the plea hearing, all six arrested individuals were presented in court. Last week, the court had extended the custodial remand of the six accused until January 5, 2024. Public Prosecutor Akhand Pratap Singh, representing Delhi Police, had previously asserted that a thorough investigation was necessary to uncover the larger conspiracy behind this meticulously planned attack. The police also requested custodial remand to ascertain the actual motive behind the attack and the accused’s potential association with any other hostile nation or terrorist organizations.

The security breach occurred on the anniversary of the 2001 Parliament terror attack. Sagar Sharma and Manoranjan D, two individuals, leaped into the Lok Sabha chamber from the public gallery during Zero Hour. They released yellow gas from canisters and shouted anti-establishment slogans before being subdued by MPs. In another incident outside the Parliament, two protestors, Neelam (42) and Amol (25), demonstrated with similar gas canisters.

Subsequently, Lalit Jha and Mahesh Kumawat were arrested by the police in connection with the case, uncovering their crucial roles in the conspiracy. Delhi Police recently informed the Patiala House Court that the Parliament Security breach conspiracy had been ongoing for more than a year, with the newly arrested accused Mahesh attending all the meetings held in various cities regarding this matter.

The police further asserted that the accused aimed to foment anarchy in the country to compel the government to accede to their unjust and illegal demands. The case revolves around a security breach that transpired on December 13, where two youths infiltrated the Lok Sabha chamber during Zero Hour, deploying smoke cans and vocalizing slogans.

The investigation unveiled that two pairs of shoes were specially ordered in Lucknow, as the accused had discovered that visitors’ shoes to the new Parliament were not scrutinized, providing an opportunity to conceal smoke cans underneath their footwear.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

12 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

12 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

12 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

13 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

13 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

13 hours ago