Categories: Other Courts

PIL in Delhi HC Seeks Steps For Compulsory Voting In Parliament, State Assembly Elections To Enhance Voter Turnout

A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been moved in Delhi High Court today seeking direction to the Centre and Election Commission of India (ECI) to take apposite steps for compulsory voting in the Parliament and State Assembly elections, in order to enhance voter’s turnout and promote the political participation, improve quality of democracy and to secure right to vote.

The petitioner Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, practicing Advocate, and the BJP leader seeks direction from the Law Commission to prepare a report on Compulsory Voting.

Therefore, the plea stated that low voter turnout is a persistent problem in India. A compulsory voting system can help to increase voter turnout, particularly among marginalized communities. It ensures that every citizen has a voice and that the government is representative of the people’s wishes. When voter turnout is high, the government is more accountable to the people and is more likely to act in their best interests.
The plea stated that the Implementation of compulsory voting has been successful in other countries, including Australia, Belgium, and Brazil. These countries have seen significant increases in voter turnout and improvements in the quality of democracy.

Furthermore, the plea said that the Supreme Court & High Court have repeatedly issued directions in past to the Election Commission to exercise its powers under Article 324 with respect to superintendence, direction, and control of the conduct of elections to Parliament and the State legislatures to redress violations of the fundamental rights and to protect the purity of electoral process and there is a good reason why the Court must take steps for simultaneous election.

The Constitution provides the right to vote as a fundamental right under Article 326. This right is subject to reasonable restrictions imposed by law. Compulsory voting can be implemented as a reasonable restriction in the interest of ensuring the smooth functioning of democracy.
Further, the plea read that The Supreme Court has also held that the right to vote is a statutory right, and the government has the power to impose reasonable restrictions on this right.

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

10 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

10 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

10 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

11 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

11 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

11 hours ago