Other Courts

Police Move Court As Juvenile Justice Board Junks Plea To Try Porsche Case Accused As Adult

The Pune police on Tuesday have filed a petition in a sessions court, opposing the Juvenile Justice Board’s (JJB) refusal to try a 17-year-old accused as an adult in the deadly Porsche car crash case.

The teenager, whose father is a prominent real estate developer, is accused of driving the luxury Porsche in an intoxicated state and fatally hitting 2 IT professionals, Anish Awadhiya and Ashwini Costa, on motorcycles in Pune’s Kalyani Nagar area last May. The incident garnered widespread media attention nationwide.

Last month, the JJB rejected the police’s request to treat the juvenile as an adult, ruling that the crime did not meet the threshold of a “heinous offence” as per the Juvenile Justice Act.

Case Insights

According to a crime branch officer, following permission from the district collector, Pune police approached the sessions court on August 4 to challenge the JJB’s decision.

Advocate Sarthi Pansare, assisting Special Public Prosecutor Shishir Hiray, stated that the prosecution argued the accused was fully aware of the consequences of drunk driving. “We have requested a psychological assessment of the juvenile, which can only be conducted if he is classified as an adult for this case. We maintain this is an exceptional situation requiring adult trial,” Pansare explained.

On the other side, defense lawyer Prashant Patil cited the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Shilpa Mittal vs State case, which clarifies the criteria for heinous crimes. Patil stressed that the prosecution’s plea contradicts the apex court’s binding guidelines and therefore is not maintainable.

He added that to classify a crime as heinous, the penal code section involved must prescribe a minimum punishment of seven years or more.

The JJB’s order noted that the accused should not undergo the preliminary assessment under Section 15 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, as such assessments apply only to heinous offences.

The teenager was granted bail just hours after the tragic accident on May 19, 2023. The leniency of bail conditions— which included writing a 300-word essay on road safety—sparked a nationwide uproar. Three days later, he was placed in a Pune observation home.

However, on June 25, 2023, the Bombay High Court ordered his immediate release, declaring the Juvenile Justice Board’s decision to remand him illegal and emphasizing the strict application of juvenile laws.

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtInternational

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay HC To Protect His Personality Rights

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…

2 months ago

Bribery Case: CBI Arrests NHIDCL Executive Director

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Slew Of Directions On Green Crackers Issue

The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…

2 months ago

INX Media Case: Delhi HC Relaxes Travel Restrictions On Karti Chidambaram

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Rules Lawyers’ Offices Not Commercial Establishments; Quashes NDMC Case Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel To Dubai For Diwali Event

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…

2 months ago