Other Courts

Pune Court Reopens 2017 Suicide Case, Orders Fresh Probe Against Industrialist

The Additional Sessions Court in Khed Rajgurunagar, Pune, has directed a reinvestigation into a 2017 abetment to suicide case against industrialist Amit Kalyani, vice chairman and joint managing director of Bharat Forge.

This overturns the earlier closure by the Economic Offences Wing (EOW), whose report clearing Kalyani had been accepted by a trial court.

Case Background

The case centers on Nilesh Gaikwad, assistant manager at Kalyani Technoforge Ltd (KTFL), who died by suicide in August 2017. In an 11-page note, Gaikwad claimed he had handed over Rs 15 crore to Kalyani, expecting a Rs 60 lakh commission, which was never paid. He alleged intense pressure from auditors after the money wasn’t returned, driving him to end his life.

Following his death, Gaikwad’s brother filed an FIR for abetment to suicide. Soon after, KTFL’s then CEO accused Gaikwad of embezzling Rs 8.72 crore. This prompted the case’s transfer to the EOW, which later filed a closure report deeming the allegations baseless.

Challenge To Closure

Gaikwad’s family contested the closure, accusing the investigation of bias and incomplete inquiry. They argued the trial court’s acceptance of the closure report was unjust and overlooked key evidence.

Represented by advocate Hrishikesh Subhedar, they raised concerns including the failure to question important witnesses, unexplained financial irregularities, absence of audits on suspicious transactions, and Kalyani’s prolonged absence abroad after the incident.

Court’s Decision

Additional Sessions Judge AS Sayyad rejected the EOW’s closure report, ordering a fresh probe. The judge highlighted that the investigation neglected vital aspects, including allegations from Gaikwad’s suicide note. “The investigating officer is duty bound to explore all angles and verify facts thoroughly,” the court observed.

The judge also stated that reopening the investigation would not harm either side and instructed police to examine all issues — including bank alerts, audit trails, attendance records, and the timeline before the suicide.

Response From Amit Kalyani’s Counsel

Kalyani’s lawyer said, “Our client is reviewing the order and will pursue remedies as per law. There is no allegation against him in the order. The report seems flawed and appears to be an attempt to harass and malign him.” The counsel added that an accountant involved in financial misconduct was already charged by the police.

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtInternational

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay HC To Protect His Personality Rights

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…

2 months ago

Bribery Case: CBI Arrests NHIDCL Executive Director

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Slew Of Directions On Green Crackers Issue

The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…

2 months ago

INX Media Case: Delhi HC Relaxes Travel Restrictions On Karti Chidambaram

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Rules Lawyers’ Offices Not Commercial Establishments; Quashes NDMC Case Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel To Dubai For Diwali Event

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…

2 months ago