Categories: Other Courts

Rail Dawa Bar Association: Delhi HC Dismisses Plea and Imposes Cost Of ₹50k On The Lawyer’s Association

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plea filed by Rail Dawa Bar Association and also imposes a cost of Rs.50,000 on the lawyer’s association.

A single bench of Justice Pratibha M. Singh was hearing a petition filed by the Rail Dawa Bar Association, Lucknow, asking the Central Government to establish a fair and transparent selection procedure for the appointment of the Chairman, Vice Chairman (Judicial), Vice Chairman (Technical), Member (Judicial), and Members (Technical) in the Railway Clams Tribunal.

It also challenged the re-appointment of Justice (Retd.) K.S. Ahluwalia as chairperson of the Railway Claims Tribunal.

Appearing for the petitioner, Advocate Ashok Pandey contended that Justice (Retd.) K.S. Ahluwalia was not eligible or competent for re-appointment and that correct procedure was not followed in the appointment process.

The Court reviewed the parties’ representations and noted that the language employed in the rejoinder clearly demonstrated that the objective was to merely raise unfounded and scandalous allegations.

The filing of the writ petition, according to Justice Pratibha M. Singh, was a malicious attempt to smear the incumbent’s reputation and a gross abuse of process, and that the process of appointment had been well explained by the Union in its counter-affidavits, and that none of the grounds raised in the petition were made out for setting aside the re-appointment.

“In the opinion of this Court, the entire attempt in this petition on behalf of the lawyers’ association is to raise aspersions against the duly constituted Tribunal. Accordingly, considering the nature of submissions made in Court and in the pleadings, the writ petition is dismissed. It is made clear that any attempt to vilify Judges, without any reasonable basis, be it Judges of Constitutional Courts, Trial Courts or judges presiding over Quasi-Judicial bodies cannot be permitted,” the bench stated.

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

14 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

14 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

14 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

15 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

15 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

15 hours ago