Legally Speaking

Ram Navami Violence: WB Govt Moves SC Against HC Order For NIA Investigation

The Supreme Court on Thursday heard the petition filed by the State of West Bengal against Calcutta High Court order transferring the investigation in the cases related to Ram Navami violence to National Investigation Agency (NIA).

A bench of Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justice PS Narasimha, and Justice JB Pardiwala decided to continue hearing the case tomorrow i.e.,19th May, 2023.

Senior Advocate Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for the State Government, stated that the NIA Act cannot be invoked for ordinary cases of violence unless it threatens the country’s security or sovereignty.

The bench did note, however, that the Explosive Substances Act of 1908 is a scheduled offence under the NIA Act, and the High Court ruled that the police purposefully failed to invoke this statute in the FIRs filed in connection with the violence.

According to Advocate Singhvi, there is no instance of using explosives in order to invoke the Explosive Substances Act.

“There was not a single bomb. No usage of that”, Singhvi stated. He claimed that the High Court issued the order in response to a politically motivated PIL filed by opposition leader Suvendhu Adhikari. He requested an urgent hearing, claiming that the NIA had summoned state police officers.

Senior Advocate PS Patwalia, representing Adhikari, opposed the stay of the HC order. The bench eventually decided to hear the case tomorrow.

On April 27, a bench of Acting Chief Justice T. S. Sivagnanam and Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya passed the impugned order after observing that miscreants were using explosives to disrupt Ram Navami processions.

The High Court observed that there appeared to be a deliberate attempt by the concerned police not to register any offence under the provisions of the Explosives Substances Act, “fighting shy of resorting to the procedure required to be complied with under Section 6(1) of the NIA Act.”

The bench also observed that during the violence, the mob became enraged and assaulted the police with bamboo sticks, threw bricks at the police, damaged one government vehicle, and then set fire to another vehicle, and when mild force was used to disperse the mob, they became even more enraged and began to assault police personnel with bamboo sticks, iron rods, stones, bricks, swords, and displaying firearms with the intent to kill police personnel, however, in the seizure list, only glass bottles and sticks and other weapons found mention.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

16 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

16 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

16 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

17 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

17 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

17 hours ago