Categories: Other Courts

Relationship Cannot Label As ‘Love-Jihad’ Just Because The Boy And Girl Belong To Different Religions: Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court recently stated that a relationship cannot be labelled as “Love Jihad” just because the boy and girl are from different religions while granting protection from arrest to four Aurangabad residents from prosecution.

A division bench of Justice Vibha Kankanwadi and Justice Abhay Waghwase of the Aurangabad bench of the Bombay High Court granted pre-arrest bail to Shaikh Sana Farheen Shahmir and her family who were accused of pressuring a man to convert to Islam and marry her.

The accused had previously been denied relief by the local court, which the high court overturned.

The man had informed the court that despite their love affair with Sana Farheen, who was also a student, she and her family members, namely her parents and sister, insisted that he convert to Islam. He even claimed that they used force to perform circumcision (Khatna) on him.

He stated, “Everything was done under pressure and with physical force. Even a large sum of money has been extracted forcibly from me, which is extortion.” His lawyer, in opposing the pre-arrest bail applications of the defendants, had stated that it was a case of ‘Love Jihad’.

The division bench, however, declined to accept this charge, claiming that the male admitted to being in a relationship with the woman in the FIR.

According to the FIR, the male had numerous opportunity to discontinue his relationship with the woman, but he did not.

“It appears that the colour of Love-Jihad has now been tried to be provided, but when love is acknowledged, there is less chance of the person being ensnared only for converting him into the other’s religion,” the bench observed.

The bench went on to say, “It cannot have a religious angle just because the boy and girl are from different religions. That could be sheer affection for each other.”

In its 23-page order, the bench noted that the woman had also filed numerous complaints against the complainant, some of which predated his own case.

The bench further stated that the investigation into the case was virtually finished and that the accused persons would not need to be kept in custody.

Since March 2018, the man and the woman have been dating. The man did not disclose to the woman that he belong to a Scheduled Caste community.

Subsequently, Sana Farheen insisted that he convert to Islam and marry her, at which point the man revealed his caste identification to her parents. They had no objections to it and even persuaded her daughter to accept it. Unfortunately, the relationship deteriorated, and the man filed a complaint against Farheen and her family in December 2022.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

8 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

8 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

8 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

9 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

9 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

9 hours ago