Categories: Other Courts

SC Collegium Reiterated Its November 2021 Nomination Of Senior Advocate Saurabh Kirpal As A Judge Of Delhi HC

The Supreme Court Collegium on Wednesday reiterated its November 2021 recommendation to nominate Senior Advocate Saurabh Kirpal as a judge of the Delhi High Court.

The Collegium, led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) D Y Chandrachud, reiterated in detail the decision of a Supreme Court Constitution Bench that held that every individual is entitled to maintain their own dignity and individuality based on sexual orientation.
It was also stated that Kirpal’s appointment will add value to the Delhi High Court bench by providing inclusion and diversity.
“In view of the constitutionally recognised rights which the candidate espouses, it would be manifestly contrary to the constitutional principles laid down by the Supreme Court to reject his candidature on that ground. “Shri Saurabh Kirpal possesses competence, integrity, and intellect,” according to the judicial appointments panel.
This explanation was given in response to the Central Government’s rejection of Kirpal’s elevation proposal on the basis of two objections, one of which was Kirpal’s openness about his sexual orientation.
According to the resolution, a letter from the Law Minister stated that while “homosexuality is no longer criminalised in India,” “same sex marriage continues to be devoid of recognition in either codified statutory law or uncodified personal law in India.” “passionate involvement and attachment to the cause of gay rights”.

In response to this, the Collegium’s resolution noted that two communications of R&AW did not reflect any apprehension in regard to the individual conduct or behaviour of Kirpal’s partner as regards national security. “There is no reason to pre-suppose that the partner of the candidate, who is a Swiss National, would be inimically disposed to our country, since the country of his origin is a friendly nation.”
It also emphasised that many people in high positions, including current and former constitutional officeholders, have foreign-national spouses.
The resolution also considers that Kirpal’s comments to the press about the recommendations being sent back for reconsideration may have been unwise.
Nonetheless, it was argued that because his name had been pending for more than five years, this should not be viewed negatively.
On October 13, 2017, the Delhi High Court Collegium unanimously recommended Kirpal, and the Supreme Court Collegium approved him on November 11, 2021.

Aksha Mishra

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

16 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

16 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

16 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

17 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

17 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

17 hours ago