Categories: Other Courts

SC Collegium Reiterated Its November 2021 Nomination Of Senior Advocate Saurabh Kirpal As A Judge Of Delhi HC

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Supreme Court Collegium on Wednesday reiterated its November 2021 recommendation to nominate Senior Advocate Saurabh Kirpal as a judge of the Delhi High Court.

The Collegium, led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) D Y Chandrachud, reiterated in detail the decision of a Supreme Court Constitution Bench that held that every individual is entitled to maintain their own dignity and individuality based on sexual orientation.
It was also stated that Kirpal’s appointment will add value to the Delhi High Court bench by providing inclusion and diversity.
“In view of the constitutionally recognised rights which the candidate espouses, it would be manifestly contrary to the constitutional principles laid down by the Supreme Court to reject his candidature on that ground. “Shri Saurabh Kirpal possesses competence, integrity, and intellect,” according to the judicial appointments panel.
This explanation was given in response to the Central Government’s rejection of Kirpal’s elevation proposal on the basis of two objections, one of which was Kirpal’s openness about his sexual orientation.
According to the resolution, a letter from the Law Minister stated that while “homosexuality is no longer criminalised in India,” “same sex marriage continues to be devoid of recognition in either codified statutory law or uncodified personal law in India.” “passionate involvement and attachment to the cause of gay rights”.

In response to this, the Collegium’s resolution noted that two communications of R&AW did not reflect any apprehension in regard to the individual conduct or behaviour of Kirpal’s partner as regards national security. “There is no reason to pre-suppose that the partner of the candidate, who is a Swiss National, would be inimically disposed to our country, since the country of his origin is a friendly nation.”
It also emphasised that many people in high positions, including current and former constitutional officeholders, have foreign-national spouses.
The resolution also considers that Kirpal’s comments to the press about the recommendations being sent back for reconsideration may have been unwise.
Nonetheless, it was argued that because his name had been pending for more than five years, this should not be viewed negatively.
On October 13, 2017, the Delhi High Court Collegium unanimously recommended Kirpal, and the Supreme Court Collegium approved him on November 11, 2021.

Aksha Mishra

Recent Posts

“Wife’s Watching Porn, Self-Pleasure Not Cruelty”: Madras HC Turns Down Husband’s Divorce Plea

The Madras High Court rejected man's request for divorce, dismissing his claims that his wife’s…

23 minutes ago

Delhi Riots Case: Delhi HC Lists Tasleem Ahmed’s Bail Plea Before Roster Bench

The Delhi High Court has scheduled the bail plea of Tasleem Ahmed for hearing before…

37 minutes ago

Omar Abdullah Announces New Assembly, Salary Hike, Final Amnesty & Heritage Push For J&K

Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah made several significant announcements on Thursday during the…

48 minutes ago

UP Court Issues Notice To Rahul Gandhi After Complaint Alleges His Words ‘Hurt Sentiments’

A local court in Sambhal has issued a notice to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, requiring…

1 hour ago

“Grabbing Minor’s Breasts, Breaking Pyjama Strings Doesn’t Qualify As Attempt To Rape”: Allahabad HC

A recent judgment by the Allahabad High Court has sparked a critical examination of India's…

2 hours ago

IPL 2025: Saliva Ban Lifted After BCCI Gets Captains’ Nod

The restriction on using saliva to shine the ball will be removed in the 2025…

3 hours ago