The Supreme Court has dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that sought directions to quash all provisions in the Constitution that do not use gender-neutral terms.
The bench, comprised of Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justice P S Narasimha, advised the petitioner, a law student named Harsh Gupta, to focus on his studies instead of filing such petitions.
The Court expressed its view that the petitioner should prioritize studying in law schools rather than filing PILs. It also stated that imposing costs may be necessary in such cases. The bench highlighted that provisions in the Constitution should not be struck down simply because they are not gender-neutral, as women can also be appointed to various posts.
In light of these considerations, the Court dismissed the plea filed by law student Harsh Gupta
The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Tuesday has issued a notice to Jindal Global…
The ED on Tuesday has filed a Prosecution Complaint before the Special Court in Mohali…
The Supreme Court on Tuesday denied bail to Arunkumar Devnath Singh, whose son is a…
The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed the Centre's appeal against a Bombay High Court order…
The Supreme Court on Tuesday has agreed to review a plea from retired Army Captain…
The Chhattisgarh Anti-Corruption Bureau on Tuesday has registered a case against 2 retired IAS officers…