The Supreme Court has dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that sought directions to quash all provisions in the Constitution that do not use gender-neutral terms.
The bench, comprised of Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justice P S Narasimha, advised the petitioner, a law student named Harsh Gupta, to focus on his studies instead of filing such petitions.
The Court expressed its view that the petitioner should prioritize studying in law schools rather than filing PILs. It also stated that imposing costs may be necessary in such cases. The bench highlighted that provisions in the Constitution should not be struck down simply because they are not gender-neutral, as women can also be appointed to various posts.
In light of these considerations, the Court dismissed the plea filed by law student Harsh Gupta
The Delhi High Court on Tuesday will hear a fresh plea filed by Leader of…
The Supreme Court on Monday directed the Medical Counselling Committee (MCC) to hold a special…
The Delhi High Court on Monday rejected the anticipatory bail plea of former IAS officer…
The Supreme Court of India recently declined to intervene in a case involving Pawan Kumar…
Former Diplomat Lakshmi Puri on Monday has approached the Delhi High Court in relation to…
Six individuals, accused of vandalizing actor Allu Arjun's residence in Hyderabad's Jubilee Hills, has granted…