Legally Speaking

SC Seeks Election Commission’s Response on Cross-Verification of Votes with VVPAT

The Supreme Court on Monday directed the Election Commission of India (ECI) to respond to a plea by an NGO seeking cross-verification of votes cast by voters with the Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) to ensure they are “counted as recorded” in the Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs).

A bench comprising Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Bela M Trivedi clarified that it is not issuing a notice to the Election Commission but only seeking a copy of the petition filed by the NGO, Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), to be served to the standing counsel of the poll panel.

The bench then directed the Election Commission to file its reply within three weeks.

“We think that it appears to be a case of over suspicion. We sometimes tend to be overly suspicious on certain matters. We are sure that they (EC) might have taken steps to rectify any such problems, if they existed. Therefore, we are not issuing notice and only asking for the copy to be served,” the bench told advocate Prashant Bhushan, who appeared for the NGO.

Advocate Bhushan acknowledged the tendency to be “over suspicious” regarding EVM hacking but argued that there are other ways in which voting machines can be manipulated.

He requested the court to tag the present plea with a similar petition that had received a notice in 2019, and the bench granted his request.

In the current petition, the NGO sought directions to the Election Commission and the central government to ensure that voters can verify through VVPATs that their vote has been “counted as recorded.”

It also sought the declaration of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961, and the Election Commission of India’s practice and procedure as unconstitutional to the extent that they violate the fundamental right of voters to verify that their vote has been “recorded as cast” and “counted as recorded.”

The plea highlighted that while the requirement for voters to verify that their votes have been “recorded as cast” is somewhat fulfilled through the display of the VVPAT slip for seven seconds after pressing the button on the EVM, there is a lack of procedure for voters to verify that their vote has been “counted as recorded.” The plea argued that this omission contradicts the directions issued by the Supreme Court in the 2013 verdict of Subramanian Swamy versus Election Commission of India.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay HC To Protect His Personality Rights

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…

2 months ago

Bribery Case: CBI Arrests NHIDCL Executive Director

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Slew Of Directions On Green Crackers Issue

The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…

2 months ago

INX Media Case: Delhi HC Relaxes Travel Restrictions On Karti Chidambaram

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Rules Lawyers’ Offices Not Commercial Establishments; Quashes NDMC Case Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel To Dubai For Diwali Event

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…

2 months ago