SC Seeks Response Of Karnataka Lokayukta Appeal Against Anticipatory Bail Granted To BJP MLA Virupakshappa

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Supreme Court on Monday sought the response of BJP Member of Legislative Assembly Madal Virupakshappa in an appeal filed by the Karnataka Lokayukta against the interim anticipatory bail granted to him in a corruption case.

A Bench of Justices Aniruddha Bose and Sudhanshu Dhulia passed the order in response to a petition challenging the Karnataka High Court’s March 7 decision granted anticipatory bail to Virupakshappa.

The State had previously mentioned the case before a different Bench, which stated that the case would be listed as soon as possible, without providing a date. Virupakshappa had moved the High Court in a case filed against him by the Lokayukta police.

A special court in Bengaluru remanded five people, including Virupakshappa’s son Prashanth Madal, to judicial custody for fourteen days on March 4 for allegedly accepting a bribe. Prashanth, who is the Joint Controller of the State Accounts Department, was the Bengaluru Jal Board’s Chief Accountant.

The Lokayukta Police allegedly caught him collecting a bribe of 40 lakh to grant a contract to supply chemicals to the Karnataka Soap and Detergent Factory (KSDL).

Shreyas Kashyap, the owner of a Bengaluru-based partnership named Chemicals Corporation, filed the case. Kashyap have successfully competed in the tender procedure to supply chemical oil to KSDL in January 2023. He reported to the Lokayukta Police that the MLA and his son requested an ₹81 lakh bribe to release the mandate and money.

Prashanth and Virupakshappa were charged under Sections 7(a) and 7(b) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The MLA is the first accused in the case, and his son is the second. Prashanth and four other people were later arrested on bribery accusations.

On March 2, they were brought before Judge B Jayanthakumar and sent to judicial custody.

“Lawyer Virupakshappa is missing. The remaining four accused have been charged under Section 8 of the PC Act. In the raids on Virupakshappara’s residences in Bangalore and Channagiri, a total of 8.3 crore was discovered, including 40 lakh in bribe money,” Lokayukta office sources informed legallyspeakings last week.

Later, Virupakshappa was granted anticipatory bail by the High Court.

Meanwhile, on March 8, a civil court in Bengaluru temporarily barred 45 media outlets from broadcasting defamatory material in connection with the case against Virupakshappa and his son Prashanth Kumar MV.

 

 

Isha Das

Recent Posts

Delhi Court Rejects BJP Leader’s Defamation Plea Against AAP’s Saurabh Bharadwaj

A Delhi court has dismissed a plea by BJP leader Suraj Bhan Chauhan seeking the…

10 hours ago

James Murray Accused Of Sending Inappropriate Messages To Minor

James Murray, one of the stars of the comedy series Impractical Jokers, is facing allegations…

10 hours ago

Mahatma Gandhi’s Great-Grandson Moves SC Against Sabarmati Ashram Redevelopment

Tushar Gandhi, the great-grandson of Mahatma Gandhi, has filed a petition in the Supreme Court…

11 hours ago

ITAT Grants Tax Exemption To Kapil Dev On ₹1.5 Crore BCCI Payment

In a significant ruling, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has recently granted tax exemption to…

11 hours ago

“Not Acceptable That Children Need To Wear Masks To Play Outside”: SC Judge Justice Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Judge Justice Vikram Nath on Saturday has raised concerns over the continued requirement…

12 hours ago

Government Criticizes ‘X’ Over Censorship Allegations In Karnataka HC

The Central government has strongly objected to claims of censorship made by Elon Musk-owned social…

13 hours ago