SC/ST Atrocities Case: Bombay HC Stays Investigation Against AAP’s Preeti Sharma Menon

The Bombay High Court recently stayed probe against Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) executive member and Mumbai president Preeti Sharma Menon in connection with a case under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

A division bench of Sunil Shukre and MM Sathaye ordered the Mumbai police to halt their investigation in the matter for four weeks until the next hearing date.

On March 16, 2023, the Andheri police station filed a first information report (FIR) against Menon in response to a complaint filed by AAP member Sanjay Kamble.

Kamble claims that on February 23, while AAP Chief and Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal was in Mumbai, he highlighted the issue of mismanagement within the party.

At the time, another member, Manu Pillai, was accused of making anti-caste slurs.

Kamble approached Menon and requested that she take action against Pillai.

Menon allegedly informed Kamble on March 10 at another meeting that “his mentality was low.”

Kamble was also allegedly denied the right to leave the office, and the incident was accompanied by sloganeering.

Kamble later filed a complaint, and a FIR was registered against Menon and others under Sections 143 (unlawful assembly), 147 (rioting), 500 (defamation), 504 (intentional insult), and 506 (threat) of the Indian Penal Code, as well as Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act 1989.

Menon approached the High Court to have the FIR dismissed.

She claimed that Kamble was found engaging in anti-party behavior and that his membership in the party had been cancelled.

Menon suspected Kamble of causing problems and filed a complaint against him on March 11, 2023.

Menon noted that Kamble’s FIR appeared to be registered under the influence of rival political parties.

Appearing for Menon, Senior Advocate Mihir Desai stated that the FIR was filed six days late. He further stated that the FIR was ambiguous and did not identify the slurs used against the plaintiff.

He also claimed that, despite the fact that the offenses were punishable by fewer than seven years in prison, no notice had been issued under Section 41A of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The division bench granted interim relief to Menon and issued notice to the Mumbai Police to stay the investigation till further hearing.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

10 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

10 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

10 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

11 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

11 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

11 hours ago