Categories: Other Courts

Supreme Court asks Comptroller of Examinations to examine students’ grievances about differences in marks calculated by CBSE, school

The Supreme Court in the case Jay Dhande & ors vs Union of India & ors observed and directed the Comptroller of Examinations to reconsider grievances of the students and take appropriate decision as there is a difference in marks calculated by CBSE and the respondent School. It was argued by the school that the CBSE is trying to cover up this inaccuracy and now the CBSE has used the opportunity to put the entire blame on the school. According to the School Committee, it was submitted that the CBSE portal was an all-inclusive portal and the portal worked as per the algorithm/program as designed by CBSE and if there is a wrong or inaccurate moderation process, the onus and the responsibility of that lies with the CBSE and not the school, according to the School Committee. Thereafter it was being argued that as per the CBSE instructions, the entire process was done precisely and as now the CBSE is putting the onus of its wrongs on the School as the School had no independent rule either in moderating or assigning the marks. Further it was argued by the School Committee that the school did not have any power or any option to moderate or assign marks on its own and the school as mentioned in the CBSE portal, the school meticulously followed each and every instruction It was further argued by the petitioner that the CBSE does not have any authority and the CBSE has changed the marks given by the School and the CBSE has awarded much less marks given by the school In the present petition the main grievance is that the marks uploaded by CBSE are much less than the marks given by the school whereas the CBSE results that are uploaded reveal by the present petitioner school students is that according to their school, the school allotted them particular marks. Further it being clarified by bench that it hasn’t expressed any opinion on the contentious issue. No expressed opinion on the contention issue is being expressed by Bench, as bench clarified In this case the main dispute is in regards with the marks allotted to the students as per 30:30:40 formula for class X, XI, XII respectively for the 2021 exams, where an alternative assessment is being restored by the Board in lieu of written exams due to. The bench comprising of Justice AM Khanwilkar and Justice JB Pardiwala has asked to explain the flow of algorithm and software which provides for different deduction of different marks student-wise to take assistance of technical team by the Comptroller of Examination

- -

Recent Posts

Guru Nanak Jayanti: Langar Organized At Supreme Court

To celebrate Guru Nanak Jayanti, the Supreme Court witnessed a special celebration as the Supreme…

14 hours ago

SC Directs Assam Tea Corp To Submit Asset List Amid Financial Struggles

The Supreme Court on Thursday directed the chairman of Assam Tea Corporation Limited to provide…

18 hours ago

SC Stays HC Order For CBI Probe Into Jharkhand Assembly Appointment Irregularities

The Supreme Court on Thursday has stayed a Jharkhand High Court ruling that ordered the…

18 hours ago

SC Denies Bail To Odisha BJP Leader In Woman Police Assault Case

The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected the anticipatory bail plea of Odisha MLA and BJP…

19 hours ago

SC Delays Hearing On PIL Over Contracts To Arunachal CM’s Family

The Supreme Court on Thursday deferred the hearing on a PIL seeking a CBI or…

20 hours ago

SC Rejects PIL To Ban WhatsApp For Failure To Comply With Govt Regulations

The Supreme Court on Thursday dismissed a PIL that sought to ban WhatsApp's operations in…

20 hours ago