Categories: Other Courts

Supreme Court: Closed Plea Against Ayodhya Judgement Addendum; Says ‘This Court Has Respect For Religions’

The Supreme Court in the case Manjit Singh Randhawa v. Union of India observed and has elucidated on certain observations contained in the addendum to the decision of the five-judge Bench in the Ayodhya judgment in the case M Siddiq (Dead) Through LRs v. Mahant Suresh Das and Ors, which the court delivered on 09.11.2019.
The bench comprising of CJI, Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Justice Hima Kohli observed in a plea filled wherein seeking expunging of certain observations in the said judgment. Therefore, the petitioner had taken objection for certain references in the addendum judgment about a defence witness’s statement regarding Guru Nanak visiting the Ram Temple at Ayodhdya.
In the present case, as the matter was called out, it has been indicated by CJI in a plea filled under Article 32 of the Constitution is not maintainable. Thus, he informed the counsel that the effect of the observations in the addendum and the judgment are not the same. Further, it was explained that the addendum does not bear the signature of the judges. It has been recorded by the bench the following clarification in the order, for the satisfaction of the petitioner.
The bench observed that while having set out the legal position, the court close these proceedings with the observation that perhaps the perspective of the petitioner is based on a misappreciation of the decision. However, the decisions cannot be construed for containing any observation reflecting on the faith of the petitioner. Thus, this court has a for the equality of religions which is a fundamental constitutional tenet embodied in Article 25 of the Constitution of India.
Further, the court noted:
The counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that with these observations, the plea filled may be closed since the grievance is duly assuaged.

The post Supreme Court: Closed Plea Against Ayodhya Judgement Addendum; Says ‘This Court Has Respect For Religions’ appeared first on The Daily Guardian.

- -

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

14 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

14 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

14 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

15 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

15 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

15 hours ago