Transporting And Possessing Cattle Within The State Not Offense Under UP Cow Slaughter Act: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court recently ruled that simply possessing or transporting a cow within the state would not amount an offense under the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955.

During the hearing of a bail plea, the court observed that the accused had been detained for nearly three months after six cows were recovered from a vehicle without any signs of physical harm.

The individual was charged under the UP Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1956, and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. Granting bail to the accused, Justice Vikram D Chauhan stated,

“Mere possession of live cow/bullock by itself cannot amount to committing, abetting, or attempting an offence under the Act No. 1 of 1956…Mere transportation of the cow from one place to another within the Uttar Pradesh would not come within the ambit of Section 5 of U.P. Act No.1 of 1956.”

The bench further noted that the State had failed to provide evidence of physical harm to any cow or its progeny that would endanger their lives.

“There is no witness to substantiate that the applicant has caused any physical injury to any cow or its progeny so as to endanger the life. No report of competent authority has been placed to show any physical injury was caused on the body of cow or bullock. There is no independent witness of the alleged recovery,” the bench emphasized.

Additionally, the State did not present any material to prove that the accused had slaughtered or been involved in the slaughter of a cow, bull, or bullock anywhere in Uttar Pradesh.

As the State could not establish the accused’s criminal history or his lack of cooperation in the investigation, the court concluded that he should not be denied bail.

Furthermore, considering that the accused had been in jail since March of this year, the court granted him bail on specific conditions, including providing a personal bond and two sureties of the same amount.

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

10 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

10 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

10 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

11 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

11 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

11 hours ago