Transporting And Possessing Cattle Within The State Not Offense Under UP Cow Slaughter Act: Allahabad HC

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Allahabad High Court recently ruled that simply possessing or transporting a cow within the state would not amount an offense under the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955.

During the hearing of a bail plea, the court observed that the accused had been detained for nearly three months after six cows were recovered from a vehicle without any signs of physical harm.

The individual was charged under the UP Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1956, and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. Granting bail to the accused, Justice Vikram D Chauhan stated,

“Mere possession of live cow/bullock by itself cannot amount to committing, abetting, or attempting an offence under the Act No. 1 of 1956…Mere transportation of the cow from one place to another within the Uttar Pradesh would not come within the ambit of Section 5 of U.P. Act No.1 of 1956.”

The bench further noted that the State had failed to provide evidence of physical harm to any cow or its progeny that would endanger their lives.

“There is no witness to substantiate that the applicant has caused any physical injury to any cow or its progeny so as to endanger the life. No report of competent authority has been placed to show any physical injury was caused on the body of cow or bullock. There is no independent witness of the alleged recovery,” the bench emphasized.

Additionally, the State did not present any material to prove that the accused had slaughtered or been involved in the slaughter of a cow, bull, or bullock anywhere in Uttar Pradesh.

As the State could not establish the accused’s criminal history or his lack of cooperation in the investigation, the court concluded that he should not be denied bail.

Furthermore, considering that the accused had been in jail since March of this year, the court granted him bail on specific conditions, including providing a personal bond and two sureties of the same amount.

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Plea Seeks Impleading ‘Radha Rani’ As Plaintiff In Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has announced that it will deliver its verdict on May 6…

6 hours ago

Defamation Case Against Rahul Gandhi: UP Court Defers Hearing To April 15

A special court in Uttar Pradesh has deferred the hearing of a defamation case against…

7 hours ago

Land Dispute: Telangana High Court Adjourns Hearing To April 7

The Telangana High Court on Thursday deferred the hearing of a case concerning a 400-acre…

8 hours ago

Supreme Court Upholds Firecracker Ban In Delhi-NCR Amid Alarming Air Pollution

The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to relax the ban on the manufacture, storage, and…

9 hours ago

Bombay HC Grants 3-Month Stay In Patanjali Advertisement Case

The Bombay High Court on thursday granted a three-month stay on the proceedings against Patanjali…

10 hours ago

Delhi Court Calls For Report From Jail Authorities On Security Measures For Christian Michel James

The Rouse Avenue Court on Thursday directed jail authorities to submit a detailed report on…

11 hours ago