WB Ram Navami Violence: SC Refuses To Stay HC Direction Transferring Of Cases To NIA

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Supreme Court on Friday refused to stay the Calcutta High Court’s order to transfer the investigation into the Ram Navami violence to the National Investigation Agency (NIA).

A bench of Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justice PS Narasimha, and Justice KV Viswanathan expressed disinclination to stay the order and postponed the petition filed by the State of West Bengal against the High Court direction after the summer vacations.

Appearing for the State government, Senior Advocate Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi stated that the NIA Act cannot be invoked for ordinary cases of violence unless it threatens the country’s security or sovereignty. He also stated that the order was issued by the High Court on the assumption that bombs and explosives were used in the violence, thus invoking the Explosives Act, which is a scheduled offence under the NIA Act.

“NIA has a clear bar. There cannot be NIA just because you say there might have been a Bomb…all this is done in a PIL, by an active member of the BJP”, Singhvi said taking objection to the High Court entertaining what he called a politically motivated PIL filed by opposition leader Suvendhu Adhikari.

Senior Advocate PS Patwalia, who was representing Adhikari, informed the bench that the NIA had filed the FIRs.

“We, after registration of FIR, we wrote to them that give us papers of investigation. They write a letter to us saying we’re before SC. So please clarify my lords…”, submitted Solicitor General of India Tushar Mehta, requesting clarification that there is no stay.

“We’re simply going to take this after vacation. We’re not staying the order of the HC”, CJI stated.

While transferring the case to the NIA, a division bench of Acting Chief Justice T. S. Sivagnanam and Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya stated that at least twelve such violent incidents had occurred in the State of Bengal since April 2021, resulting in significant loss of life and public property.

The High Court observed that the use of explosives and the hurling of bombs had become commonplace during rallies and religious ceremonies. The bench also stated that in more than eight orders concerning the violent incidents, it was forced to transfer the investigation to the NIA because the state police downplayed the true state of affairs.

 

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

SC Ruling Paves Way For Visually Impaired Judges; Yavnika Shares Her Experience

Supreme Court recently opened up the doors for visually impaired candidates in judiciary by striking…

2 days ago

Supreme Court To Hear Plea To Debar Poll Candidates Charged For Serious Offences On Mar 18

The Supreme Court is set to hear a plea on March 18 that seeks to…

2 days ago

Bombay HC Grants Pension Benefits To Former Judge Pushpa Ganediwala

The Bombay High Court has ruled in favor of former Additional Judge Pushpa Ganediwala, granting…

2 days ago

Bombay HC Sets Aside Complaint Against Kailash Kher For Hurting Religious Feelings

The Bombay High Court has dismissed a complaint against singer Kailash Kher, which alleged that…

2 days ago

Uttarakhand HC Stays Proposed Felling Of 3,300 Trees In Shivalik Elephant Reserve

The Uttarakhand High Court has put a temporary halt on the felling of 3,300 trees…

2 days ago

“Notify Posts For Special Education Teachers By March 28”: Supreme Court To States, UTs

The Supreme Court has directed all states and Union Territories to notify the sanctioned posts…

2 days ago