WB Ram Navami Violence: SC Refuses To Stay HC Direction Transferring Of Cases To NIA

The Supreme Court on Friday refused to stay the Calcutta High Court’s order to transfer the investigation into the Ram Navami violence to the National Investigation Agency (NIA).

A bench of Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justice PS Narasimha, and Justice KV Viswanathan expressed disinclination to stay the order and postponed the petition filed by the State of West Bengal against the High Court direction after the summer vacations.

Appearing for the State government, Senior Advocate Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi stated that the NIA Act cannot be invoked for ordinary cases of violence unless it threatens the country’s security or sovereignty. He also stated that the order was issued by the High Court on the assumption that bombs and explosives were used in the violence, thus invoking the Explosives Act, which is a scheduled offence under the NIA Act.

“NIA has a clear bar. There cannot be NIA just because you say there might have been a Bomb…all this is done in a PIL, by an active member of the BJP”, Singhvi said taking objection to the High Court entertaining what he called a politically motivated PIL filed by opposition leader Suvendhu Adhikari.

Senior Advocate PS Patwalia, who was representing Adhikari, informed the bench that the NIA had filed the FIRs.

“We, after registration of FIR, we wrote to them that give us papers of investigation. They write a letter to us saying we’re before SC. So please clarify my lords…”, submitted Solicitor General of India Tushar Mehta, requesting clarification that there is no stay.

“We’re simply going to take this after vacation. We’re not staying the order of the HC”, CJI stated.

While transferring the case to the NIA, a division bench of Acting Chief Justice T. S. Sivagnanam and Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya stated that at least twelve such violent incidents had occurred in the State of Bengal since April 2021, resulting in significant loss of life and public property.

The High Court observed that the use of explosives and the hurling of bombs had become commonplace during rallies and religious ceremonies. The bench also stated that in more than eight orders concerning the violent incidents, it was forced to transfer the investigation to the NIA because the state police downplayed the true state of affairs.

 

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

12 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

12 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

12 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

13 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

13 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

13 hours ago