Categories: Other Courts

Witnesses Are Eyes & Ears Of Justice: Madras HC

The Madras High Court recently stated that witnesses are the eyes and ears of the judicial system, and they must be given the confidence to testify without fear or favour before the Court.

A single bench of Justice B. Pugalendhi made the observation while hearing the State’s plea to reject bail granted to a suspended Police Inspector for allegedly manipulating witnesses.

“Witnesses are the eyes and ears of the justice. Witnesses have to be instilled confidence to depose without any fear or favour before the Court.”, the bench stated.

The case pertains to the suspension of a police officer on the basis of a complaint saying that the Police had received Rs.10 lakh from the defacto complainant and threatened him with a case.

When the defacto complainant attempted to obtain the money the next day, he was threatened that if he insisted on money, a criminal case would be filed against him. As a result, he filed a complaint.

Following that, a case was filed, and the officer was arrested who later got bail from the High Court.

In the meantime, the police officer and other defendants submitted an application to void the investigation’s final report on the grounds that the parties had compromised.

The Court did remark, however, that there is no particular averment against the accused that she contacted the defacto complainant at any point in time or in any form and either influenced, persuaded, or intimidated the defacto complainant, so inducing compromise.

Consequently, the bench emphasised that the bail could not be revoked, but it also stated that it could not be a mute spectator to any subversion of the judicial process.

The single bench ordered the Inspector General of Police (South Zone) to form a special team to investigate if the accused sought to manipulate the de facto complainant or any other witnesses. It further stated that if there is any attempt to tamper with the witnesses, the investigative officer must file a separate case.

The bench further directed the District Legal Services Authority in Madurai to conduct an investigation and issue any necessary witness protection orders to any witnesses who require or request protection.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

10 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

10 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

11 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

11 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

11 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

11 hours ago