Supreme Court

Abrogation of Article 370: SC Reserves Verdict after 16-Days Hearing

The Supreme Court on Tuesday reserved its verdict on a bunch of pleas challenging the abrogation of Article 370 of the Constitution, which granted special status to the former state of Jammu and Kashmir.

A constitution bench of Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, along with Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, BR Gavai, and Surya Kant, concluded the hearing after a 16-day marathon session.

The bench listened to the rejoinder arguments put forth by senior advocates Kapil Sibal, Gopal Subramanium, Rajeev Dhavan, Zaffar Shah, Dushyant Dave, and others on the final day of the proceedings.

The apex court stated that any lawyer representing the petitioners or respondents who wishes to file a written submission can do so within the next three days. However, these submissions should not exceed two pages.

Throughout the 16-day hearing process, the Supreme Court heard from Attorney General R Venkataramani, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, senior advocates Harish Salve, Rakesh Dwivedi, V Giri, and others representing the Central government and intervenors supporting the abrogation of Article 370.

The lawyers extensively discussed various issues, including the constitutional validity of the Central government’s decision on August 5, 2019, to revoke the provision, the legality of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, which bifurcated the former state into two Union Territories, challenges to the imposition of Governor’s rule in Jammu and Kashmir on June 20, 2018, and the imposition of President’s rule in the former state on December 19, 2018, along with its subsequent extension on July 3, 2019.

Several petitions challenging the abrogation of Article 370 and the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, which divided the former state into two Union Territories, namely Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, were referred to a constitution bench back in 2019.

Ashish Sinha

-Ashish Kumar Sinha -Editor Legally Speaking -Ram Nath Goenka awardee - 14 Years of Experience in Media - Covering Courts Since 2008

Recent Posts

Punjab & Haryana HC Notice To Jindal Law School Over AI-Generated Exam Claims

The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Tuesday has issued a notice to Jindal Global…

3 hours ago

ED Files Money Laundering Complaint Against Charanjit Singh Bajaj, 4 Others

The ED on Tuesday has filed a Prosecution Complaint before the Special Court in Mohali…

3 hours ago

Pune Porsche Case: SC Rejects Anticipatory Bail To Father Of Minor Driver’s Friend

The Supreme Court on Tuesday denied bail to Arunkumar Devnath Singh, whose son is a…

4 hours ago

SC Dumps Plea Against Quashing LOC For Sushant Singh Rajput’s Ex-House Help

The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed the Centre's appeal against a Bombay High Court order…

5 hours ago

Rape Case: SC Issues Notice On Ex-Army Officer’s Plea For Quashing Charge sheet

The Supreme Court on Tuesday has agreed to review a plea from retired Army Captain…

5 hours ago

Chhattisgarh NAN Scam: FIR Against 2 Retired IAS Officers, Former AG

The Chhattisgarh Anti-Corruption Bureau on Tuesday has registered a case against 2 retired IAS officers…

5 hours ago