Bihar Caste-Based Survey: SC Judge Justice Sanjay Karol Recuses From Hearing The Matter

The Supreme Court judge Justice Sanjay Karol on Wednesday recused himself from hearing the petition filed by the State of Bihar challenging the Patna High Court’s interim order staying the Bihar Government’s decision to conduct a caste-based survey.

Justice Karol, who served as Chief Justice of the Patna High Court before being elevated to the Supreme Court on February 6, stated that he handled the matter at the High Court. The petition was heard today before a bench consisting of Justices BR Gavai and Sanjay Karol.

Senior Advocate Shyam Divan, appearing on behalf of the State Government, requested permission to seek urgent listing tomorrow. The bench agreed.

According to the High Court, the caste-based survey amounts to a census, which the State Government does not have the authority to conduct.

“Prima facie, we are of the opinion that the State has no power to carry out a caste-based survey, which would amount to a census, thus impinging on the legislative power of the Union Parliament,” the bench stated.

The bench of Chief Justice K. Vinod Chandran and Justice Madhuresh Prasad noted that the right to privacy is also a concern in the case.

“We also see from the notification issued that the Government intends to share data with the leaders of different parties of the State Assembly, the ruling party and opposition party which is also a matter of great concern,” the bench noted.

The matter is scheduled to be heard by the High Court on 3rd July, 2023.

The decision came six days after the Supreme Court directed the Patna High Court to consider, decide, and dispose of the interim application of ‘Youth for Equality’ (petitioner before the High Court) as soon as possible, preferably within three days of the application’s filing and mention before the Chief Justice of the High Court.

On January 7, 2023, the Bihar government launched the caste survey. The plan is to digitally compile data on each family in the survey from the panchayat to the district level using a mobile application.

The petitioner essentially seeks to overturn the State Government’s notification on the grounds that the subject of the census is listed in List 1 of the Seventh Schedule to the Indian Constitution and that only the Union Government is authorized to conduct the census.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

14 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

14 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

14 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

15 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

15 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

15 hours ago