Supreme Court

Child Pornography: SC Agrees to review Madras HC Order

The Supreme Court has agreed to review the Madras High Court’s decision regarding the legality of downloading and possessing child pornography. Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, leading the bench, has issued a notice on the petition filed by NGOs Just Rights for Children Alliance and Bachpan Bachao Andolan, represented by senior advocate HS Phoolka.

The petition contests the Madras High Court’s ruling on January 11 this year, which dismissed the FIR and criminal proceedings related to child pornography downloads, stating that such actions are not criminal under Section 67B of the Information Technology (IT) Act, 2000.

Expressing concern over the potential promotion of child pornography and its adverse impact on children’s welfare, the petition argues against the notion that downloading and possessing such material is not a crime. The NGOs assert that this misconception, fueled by the Madras High Court’s decision, could escalate the demand for child pornography and endanger innocent children.

The case arose when Chennai Police, upon seizing the accused’s phone and discovering child pornography, initiated legal action under Section 67B of the IT Act and Section 14(1) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

The petition challenges the Madras High Court’s reliance on a Kerala High Court judgment, arguing that the nature of the present case, involving minors in explicit material, falls within the purview of the POCSO Act. It emphasizes the distinction between mere viewing of obscene content and the involvement of minors in sexual exploitation, urging the court to consider the gravity of the offense.

Highlighting the legal framework’s emphasis on safeguarding children from sexual exploitation, the petition underscores that Indian laws, including the POCSO Act and the IT Act, criminalize the creation, distribution, and possession of child pornography. It emphasizes that even mere possession of such material constitutes a serious offense under various legal provisions, underscoring the importance of prioritizing child protection.

Ashish Sinha

-Ashish Kumar Sinha -Editor Legally Speaking -Ram Nath Goenka awardee - 14 Years of Experience in Media - Covering Courts Since 2008

Recent Posts

KJS Cement Case: SC Refuses To Set Aside Second FIR Against Pawan Kumar Ahluwalia

The Supreme Court of India recently declined to intervene in a case involving Pawan Kumar…

34 minutes ago

Non-Compliance In 2021 Defamation Case: Former Diplomat Lakshmi Puri Moves Delhi HC Against TMC leader Saket Gokhale

Former Diplomat Lakshmi Puri on Monday has approached the Delhi High Court in relation to…

1 hour ago

Vandalism At Allu Arjun’s House: Hyderabad Court Grants Bail To 6 Accused

Six individuals, accused of vandalizing actor Allu Arjun's residence in Hyderabad's Jubilee Hills, has granted…

1 hour ago

BJP MLAs Petition Delhi HC Over Pending CAG Reports

Several Bharatiya Janata Party MLAs from Delhi have approached the Delhi High Court on Monday…

2 hours ago

Delhi HC Extends Kuldeep Singh Sengar’s Interim Bail For One Month

The Delhi High Court on Monday has extended the interim bail of Kuldeep Singh Sengar,…

2 hours ago

Supreme Court Says “Marriage Is Relationship Built On Mutual Trust, Companionship”

The Supreme Court has upheld a decision by the Madras High Court granting a divorce…

2 days ago